Skill UI

This skill guides users in elevating empirical findings from diverse sociological methods (quantitative, ethnographic, historical, etc.) into a generalizable, portable theoretical argument. It provides a structured framework to define core mechanisms, concepts, scope conditions, and observable implications, ensuring the contribution meets the rigorous standards of top-tier academic journals by proving its transferability beyond a single case or subfield.

This skill creates a standardized, persistent workspace (desk) for managing long-running projects or complex workstreams. It sets up a structured directory containing a detailed journal for historical context and a dedicated signals folder for structured data output, ensuring continuity across multiple sessions.

This skill facilitates the loading and application of relevant historical experience memories (OpenViking memories) before executing task actions. It guides the user through a rigorous process: querying memories, applying strict applicability and exclusion checks (gating), and prioritizing real-time facts over loaded guidance. Essential for complex, multi-intent conversational flows.

This guide determines if a scholarly manuscript aligns with the scope of *History and Theory*, a leading venue for the philosophy of history and historical theory. It emphasizes that accepted submissions must contain an original theoretical or methodological argument, rather than merely being an empirical case study. Use this resource to frame, re-check, or select the appropriate academic venue for your advanced research.

A detailed guide for academic authors, outlining the specific methodological, historical, and comparative requirements for submitting scholarly work to the journal History of Religions. It emphasizes the need for cross-cultural comparison, morphological analysis, and rigorous grounding in primary sources and philology, helping authors re-frame their research fit.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors submitting empirical, quantitative, or theoretical growth papers. It details how to package data sources, code pipelines, calibration files, and historical/geospatial artifacts to meet stringent reproducibility standards for publishing journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to the Journal of International Economics (JIE). It details the various submission types (regular, short, PRP), the stages of editorial handling (desk screen, referee rounds), historical acceptance odds, and best practices for maximizing manuscript chances of acceptance in top-tier economics journals.

This guide details the scope and requirements for submitting to the Journal of Chengdu Sport University. The journal excels in areas like sport history, ethnic traditional sports, martial arts, and traditional health culture. It is best suited for academically rigorous papers that utilize historical or ethnographic methods to connect deep cultural roots with modern sports science.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors submitting historical-musicology manuscripts to high-tier academic journals, such as the Journal of the American Musicological Society. It helps determine if a manuscript presents an original, significant argument beyond a niche focus, assessing the rigor of the methodology, the depth of source engagement (archival, notational), and adherence to established academic standards. Use this guide when positioning, reframing, or conducting a pre-submission self-check for major scholarly publications.

A comprehensive guide for selecting and justifying research designs in Organization Studies. It covers rigorous standards for both qualitative (ethnographic, process, historical) and quantitative approaches. The core principle emphasized is that the design must directly illuminate the underlying organizational mechanism or process, not just measure endpoints.

This guide provides expert advice on structuring the "Related Work" section for top-tier systems conferences (like OSDI, SOSP, NSDI). It emphasizes that the section must function as a "difference ledger," detailing the mechanism-level distinctions between your proposed system and all prior art. Learn how to categorize competitors, cite historical ancestors, manage anonymity, and rigorously verify all venue citations to maximize impact.

This skill guides authors in assessing whether their scholarly work—particularly those employing New Historicism or interdisciplinary cultural analysis—is suitable for highly specialized academic venues. It emphasizes the necessity of building arguments outward from concrete historical or material particulars (like archival fragments or objects), rather than relying on free-floating theory. Use this aid to re-frame and strengthen the material basis of your scholarly manuscript before submission.