Skill UI

This comprehensive guide outlines best practices for designing and auditing empirical evaluations of formal verification tools and algorithms. It stresses the use of shared, community-accepted benchmarks, ensuring fair comparison against the strongest baselines with equal resources, meticulous reporting of all metrics, validating results for soundness, and guaranteeing full reproducibility on clean virtual environments.

A comprehensive skill designed to assess the suitability of a manuscript for The BMJ (British Medical Journal). It provides expert guidance on journal positioning, required methodological rigor (e.g., CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE compliance), open data commitments, structured abstract requirements, and the specific standards necessary for submission to a leading, patient-centered, evidence-based medical journal. Use this to re-frame and optimize your research paper before submission.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting The Innovation journal with cross-disciplinary breakthrough manuscripts. It assesses the journal's specific fit, rigorous method and evidence bar, required structure, and house style, ensuring the work is scientifically significant and legible to multiple fields. Use this to optimize your submission before official guidelines.

This skill helps authors assess if their manuscript (covering theology, philosophy, or religious history) is a strong fit for The Journal of Religion. It provides exhaustive guidance on scholarly requirements, argument depth, methodological rigor, and submission norms, ensuring the work meets the high standards of a broad, generalist academic audience.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for submitting high-impact clinical and population research to The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. It details the journal's specialized scope, which favors practice-changing randomized trials and major prospective cohorts in respiratory and critical care. The guide highlights the rigorous evidence bar, including expected reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA), statistical rigor, and structural house style, serving as a crucial fit and framing aid for authors.

A workflow designed for careful, incremental development. It mandates breaking down large tasks into the smallest meaningful steps, pausing for immediate feedback after each segment. This continuous validation process ensures the direction is correct early on, minimizing risk and making the entire process highly reviewable and manageable.

This guide provides a rigorous methodology for achieving scientific reproducibility in technical and user experience papers (e.g., UIST). It details three essential 'ledgers': the Build Ledger (pinning software, hardware, and environment dependencies), the Measurement Ledger (defining precise protocols for metrics like latency and accuracy), and the Study Ledger (documenting human evaluation tasks). Following these protocols ensures that external researchers can accurately rebuild the artifact and validate reported results.

This guide outlines the methodology for preparing research artifacts for rigorous academic reproducibility evaluations, such as those run by VLDB/SIGMOD. It details the required components—including prototype code, input data, workloads, and analysis scripts—to structure a comprehensive package. The goal is to ensure that any external evaluator can independently and flawlessly rebuild and validate all claimed results, maximizing the chances of winning reproducibility awards.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for designing and auditing academic tables and figures, specifically for development economics journals. It teaches how to translate statistical coefficients into actionable policy magnitudes, validate research design (e.g., balance checks, pre-trends), and adhere to strict page limits while maintaining clarity for both economists and policymakers.

This comprehensive checklist guides researchers through the final stages of academic manuscript preparation for submission to major journals via platforms like ScholarOne. It covers critical technical requirements, including word count limits (12,500 words), abstract length (150 words), adherence to triple-blind anonymity standards, proper formatting (World Politics Style Sheet), and ethical compliance (APSA guidelines). Use this guide before hitting the submit button to minimize avoidable rejections.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR), a high-impact journal for authoritative, continuously updated review articles in relativity and gravitation. It covers the journal's unique 'living' model, required evidence standards, scope definition, house style, and the long-term commitment required to create a definitive, pedagogical survey article.

Scans your local machine's Git history to locate abandoned or unfinished side projects. It performs a deep 'autopsy' on these repositories, determining their causes of death (e.g., deployment fear, killed by newer ideas) and identifying personal developmental patterns. The tool then surfaces the most promising candidate for resurrection, helping you finally ship it.