Skill UI

This skill processes clinical text to interpret laboratory results. It parses reference ranges (e.g., "135-145", "<5") and derives structured abnormal flags (low, normal, high, critical) for a given numeric value. It is unit-agnostic and respects explicit flags provided by the originating lab, making it crucial for structured clinical data extraction and interpretation workflows.

This skill parses complex, free-text clinical trial eligibility criteria from sources like ClinicalTrials.gov into structured, machine-readable rules. It then evaluates these criteria against a comprehensive patient profile (derived from OpenMed data) to determine potential eligibility. The output provides an explainable verdict (eligible, ineligible, or unknown) for every criterion, serving as a critical decision support tool for clinicians and researchers.

Guides users to select a local, on-device Personally Identifiable Information (PII) detection model from a committed registry. It filters models based on language, required runtime environment (e.g., PyTorch, MLX), and size constraints. The process emphasizes building an offline shortlist and mandates rigorous pre-deployment recall validation and performance benchmarking to ensure secure, privacy-preserving deployment.

A comprehensive multi-step pipeline tool that executes a fully validated development plan. It handles worktree isolation, TDD scaffolding, parallel task execution across architectural layers, quality gating (linting, testing, smoke tests), documentation reconciliation, PR creation, and final merge, ensuring the feature is fully documented and integrated.

This robust pipeline guides development teams through a rigorous, five-phase planning process *before* writing any code. It systematically analyzes PRDs, design specifications (UX, accessibility), and existing architecture to produce a comprehensive implementation plan. Key outputs include Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), detailed task breakdowns, and verification strategies, ensuring all technical and design decisions are documented and scoped.

Performs comprehensive, two-layer validation on generated plans. Layer 1 executes instant structural checks (format, dependencies, compliance) while Layer 2 triggers specialist agents (e.g., security, DB, performance) based on plan content. The system forces resolution of all identified issues before allowing execution, supporting auto-fixes and guided human input.

This utility analyzes code changes within a branch compared to the base branch. It calculates a complexity score, detects scope coherence issues (warning if changes are too large or unrelated), and generates a fully structured Pull Request (PR) draft. It automates the creation of titles, comprehensive descriptions (including checklists and technical details), and even suggests splitting the PR into smaller, manageable units, significantly improving code review quality and efficiency.

This skill provides a comprehensive, 4-phase workflow for managing and reviewing a pull request backlog. It automatically audits open PRs, classifying them by size, staleness, overlap, and CI status. Users can then initiate deep code reviews, generate comment drafts, and set up local worktrees for systematic maintenance and quality assurance.

A comprehensive guide for auditing and polishing original long-form manuscripts intended for submission to high-level Pattern Recognition and AI journals. It details mandatory components, formatting standards, anti-plagiarism checks, and ethical guidelines, ensuring the paper meets rigorous peer-review standards for publication.

A comprehensive, multi-phase workflow guide for authorized reverse engineering of complex network protocols. Ideal for analyzing proprietary formats such as custom TCP/UDP binary protocols, Protobuf, gRPC, WebSocket frames, and reconstructing state machines from raw PCAP data. This guide covers data collection, field layout restoration, serialization recovery, and secure replaying.

Implements GDPR-compliant pseudonymization for sensitive personal or clinical data from EU residents. Unlike full anonymization, this method creates a reversible mapping key, which must be stored separately and securely. This process allows for controlled re-linkage (e.g., for Subject Access Requests or longitudinal care) while maintaining GDPR Article 4(5) compliance by ensuring the linkage key is kept separate from the working data.

A comprehensive, multi-step framework for conducting systematic QA testing on web applications. This guide covers scope detection (diff-aware), tiered testing depth (Quick, Standard, Exhaustive), detailed issue taxonomy (Functional, Visual, UX, etc.), structured bug documentation, and the critical fix-and-verify loop, ensuring high code quality throughout the development cycle.