Skill UI

This skill provides expert guidance on design engineering, focusing on UI polish, micro-interactions, and high-craft component decisions. It is ideal for reviewing frontend code (React, CSS, Tailwind) to elevate perceived quality, addressing details like easing, duration, and physical feedback. Use it when subtle detail and refined taste are critical differentiators.

This comprehensive guide helps elevate a UI from merely functional to polished, purposeful, and aesthetically coherent with its domain. It dictates pre-coding design choices, such as defining the audience, tone (e.g., minimal, industrial), and purpose. It provides rigorous guidelines on establishing visual hierarchy, typography, color palettes, and interactions, ensuring the final product feels intentional and professional, rather than generic or templated.

A reference collection of motion patterns covering animation principles, easing curves, timing, sequencing and transitions. Useful for UI motion design, micro-interactions and frontend animation implementation.

This skill acts as an expert guide for creating comprehensive, implementation-ready design system documentation. It structures guidelines by defining foundational tokens (color, typography, spacing), detailing component anatomy, interaction states, and adhering to strict accessibility standards (WCAG 2.2 AA). Use it to ensure your design standards are consistent, technically sound, and actionable for engineering and design teams.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for designing, auditing, and reporting high-rigor multi-agent experiments, especially in game theory and self-play systems. It emphasizes testing the *interaction* claim—such as convergence to equilibrium, truthful behavior, or emergent cooperation—against held-out opponents, populations, and strategic deviations, moving beyond simple single-agent leaderboard scores.

A comprehensive guide designed to help researchers determine the optimal conference or journal venue (e.g., AAMAS, NeurIPS, ICML, EC) for multi-agent AI research. It emphasizes that the contribution must center on the interaction result—such as mechanism design, coordination, or negotiation—rather than simply applying a single-agent method in a multiagent testbed. This tool sharpens the research framing before writing begins.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting top Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) conferences like CHI. It helps authors position their manuscripts, define required contribution types (e.g., system, dataset, empirical finding), and structure the paper to meet the rigorous standards of human-centered computing reviewers, focusing on user experience and design implication.

This guide provides rigorous guidelines for creating high-quality figures and tables for complex systems manuscripts, especially in agricultural science. It emphasizes shifting focus from single-factor bar charts to systemic visualizations that reveal interactions, trade-offs (e.g., Pareto fronts), model dynamics, resource flows (Sankey diagrams), and model performance (observed-vs-simulated fit). Exhibits must be self-contained, reproducible, and convey uncertainty.

A comprehensive guide for academic researchers on designing, auditing, and reporting rigorous studies (experiments, field deployments, surveys, etc.) for Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) papers. It details best practices for quantitative power analysis, qualitative thematic analysis, ethical reporting, and mixed-methods integration to ensure research claims are strongly supported by evidence.

This guide details best practices for structuring and writing the "Related Work" section for top-tier Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) conferences like CHI. It emphasizes moving beyond mere literature inventory to actively positioning your contribution by identifying research gaps across various disciplinary lanes (e.g., Psychology, Design, HCI family). Following these guidelines is crucial for avoiding desk rejection due to insufficient contextualization.

This guide provides comprehensive methodological standards for conducting high-quality human-subjects studies in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). It covers the entire research lifecycle, including choosing optimal designs (within/between-subjects), ensuring statistical power, reporting effect sizes, and adhering to ethical guidelines (e.g., Wizard-of-Oz disclosure). It ensures research meets the rigorous academic standards required for top-tier publications.

This skill guides authors on positioning manuscripts for the IEEE RO-MAN conference. It helps assess suitability, reframes content from general CS styles, and structures the narrative around core human-robot communication, social behavior, and interaction design. Use it for strategic venue selection and improving submission quality for human-robot interaction research.