Skill UI

This guide helps researchers strategically position their manuscripts for top-tier venues like ACM DIS. It provides deep insight into the required scope, contribution types (e.g., design artifacts, methods, theory), evidence standards (e.g., controlled study, field deployment), and necessary framing adjustments to ensure the work aligns perfectly with the conference's community expectations. Use this tool for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and submission strategy.

This guide provides authors with a comprehensive framework for positioning technical manuscripts for the ACM Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS) conference. It covers essential areas like defining scope, aligning hardware evidence with interaction techniques, optimizing the narrative structure, and understanding the specific community expectations for spatial and tangible computing.

A comprehensive guide for positioning research manuscripts for the ACM SIGGRAPH I3D Symposium. It covers core topics like real-time rendering, interactive 3D systems, and GPU algorithms, advising authors on how to frame their work, structure evidence, and compare it against related academic venues to maximize submission success.

A specialized guide for authors targeting the ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR). It assesses whether a manuscript fits the venue's core focus on human-centered IR, user behavior, and interactive search. Provides strategies for framing contributions, analyzing evidence gaps, and optimizing submission readiness for top-tier academic publication.

This comprehensive guide helps authors strategically position and refine manuscripts for top-tier UI/CS conferences like UIST. It covers core fit areas—including interactive techniques, AR/VR, and UI engineering—and provides detailed advice on structuring evidence, framing contributions, and meeting rigorous academic standards to maximize the paper's acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing the supplementary material for multimedia conferences (e.g., ACM MM). It details how to structure the content, separating core arguments (Body) from supporting evidence (Supplement). Learn best practices for packaging videos, audio, and interactive demos, ensuring technical compatibility (H.264/MP4), maintaining anonymity for double-blind review, and creating a legible, reviewer-friendly submission index.

This skill provides a comprehensive pre-submission checklist for manuscripts targeting Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP), an EGU journal. It details the journal's scope—covering aerosols, clouds, chemistry, and dynamics—and outlines the rigorous standards required, including open-access policies, mandatory FAIR data practices, detailed methodological transparency, and preparation for interactive public peer review. Use this guide to assess the fit and completeness of your scientific work.

This skill guides authors on positioning manuscripts for the IEEE RO-MAN conference. It helps assess suitability, reframes content from general CS styles, and structures the narrative around core human-robot communication, social behavior, and interaction design. Use it for strategic venue selection and improving submission quality for human-robot interaction research.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting top-tier conferences like AVI. It helps assess the suitability of a computer science manuscript for visual interaction, interactive visualization, and multimodal interfaces. The tool provides strategies for re-framing the paper, identifying necessary evidence (user tasks, empirical findings), and structuring the submission to meet specific venue expectations.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors responding to peer reviews in major security conferences. It details how to triage reviewers' comments, structure technical responses (pointing to evidence, not arguing), handle complex objections like adaptive attacks and ethics, and effectively participate in the interactive discussion phase to refine the paper.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors targeting The Cryosphere journal. It details the journal's scope (ice sheets, permafrost, sea ice), high methodological standards (FAIR data, uncertainty quantification), and the unique EGU interactive public peer-review process. Use this tool to determine if a cryospheric study is suitable for this specific open-access venue.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for designing rigorous technical evaluations for interactive systems, specifically tailored for top-tier venues like UIST. It emphasizes matching evaluation methods to specific artifact claims, reporting distributions over means, closing the interaction loop, and performing thorough ablations against real-world baselines. This framework ensures the scientific rigor and credibility of submitted research.