Skill UI

A comprehensive guide detailing when and how to structure theoretical models in development economics research, particularly for World Bank Economic Review submissions. It emphasizes that models must serve a functional purpose—such as interpreting empirical coefficients, running policy counterfactuals, or aggregating to welfare statements—rather than being decorative. Key principles cover parameter identification, matching structural frictions to the local setting, and handling counterfactual assumptions (Lucas critique).

A detailed guide for structuring and positioning development economics research for high-impact journals like The World Bank Economic Review (WBER). It teaches researchers to reframe their work to satisfy two crucial criteria: rigorous empirical design (credible empirics) and actionable policy relevance in developing countries, ensuring the work transcends being a mere project report.

This comprehensive router guides authors through the entire lifecycle of a rigorous development economics manuscript targeted at The World Bank Economic Review (WBER). It outlines the ideal sequence of specialized skills—from initial topic selection and literature positioning to establishing credible causal identification, managing robustness checks, and preparing the final submission package and rebuttal letter, ensuring the paper meets WBER's demanding standards.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors writing for development economics journals, specifically addressing the need to bridge the gap between rigorous econometric analysis and actionable policy advice. It teaches how to structure introductions, write concise abstracts, and frame findings by emphasizing policy magnitudes over statistical significance, ensuring the work speaks to both technical economists and non-specialist policymakers.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for packaging and submitting research artifacts (datasets, models, code) for major conferences. It details the difference between mere 'existence' (badge verification) and true academic 'reproducibility,' covering archival strategies, web data licensing, takedown resilience, and minimal viable package structure for long-term scholarly impact.

This comprehensive guide details the strategic process of writing a high-impact rebuttal for major academic conferences. It teaches users how to triage mixed reviewer feedback, differentiate between in-track, adjacent-track, and web-fit objections, and structure responses using concrete evidence, specific citations, and confident concessions to maximize the paper's acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing camera-ready submissions for Web Conferences. It covers the critical pre-acceptance steps, such as de-anonymization, restoring acknowledgements, managing ACM e-rights, and submitting associated artifacts. Learn how to navigate the tight production pipeline, ensuring compliance with ACM standards and meeting strict page limits.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting papers to web conferences. It details how to structure empirical claims, ensuring evidence matches the claim's scope (scale, freshness, generalizability). The guide covers avoiding methodological flaws like temporal or popularity leakage, selecting datasets with proper provenance, and performing rigorous ablations and statistical analysis for maximum academic rigor.

This guide provides an expert methodology for writing the 'Related Work' section for top-tier web conferences (like WWW). It teaches authors how to establish the paper's academic lineage, contrast the work against competing venues (e.g., SIGIR, KDD), and manage citation hygiene, ensuring maximum impact within strict page limits.

A comprehensive guide for ensuring the scientific reproducibility of research papers that rely on dynamic web data, such as web crawls, platform APIs, or live system traffic. It defines three reproducibility regimes (Frozen, Decaying, Unreplayable) and provides detailed instructions on documenting data decay, temporal splits, environment configurations, and computational seeds to maintain the rigor of published findings.

This skill models the entire peer-review pipeline for Web Conferences (WWW), detailing the stages from abstract submission to final notification. It guides authors and reviewers on the implications of track-scoped double-blind review, emphasizing criteria such as Web-centricity, evidence scale, and ethical considerations required for acceptance.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting research papers to major Web Conferences (WWW). It details critical, irreversible steps such as author list freezing, restrictive page arithmetic (12 pages total), track selection protocols, anonymity checks, and managing submission caps. Essential reading for research teams preparing for demanding academic deadlines.