Skill UI

This helper tool is designed to assist with a wide variety of tasks and needs. It encourages users to use their own judgment and judgment to handle diverse prompts, making it a flexible and adaptable resource for general problem-solving scenarios. Ideal for brainstorming, general queries, and initial exploration.

A comprehensive guide on structuring empirical research papers for top-tier conferences, such as FSE. It outlines strict partitioning rules, ensuring that all decision-critical evidence, core arguments, and key findings reside within the primary reviewed body, while supplementary artifacts and appendices provide necessary, but non-judgmental, support. Covers page budget discipline, double-anonymity requirements, and optimizing the paper's flow.

This guide provides essential instructions for authors submitting research to the ECAI conference, focusing on creating credible and reproducible artifacts. It strongly cautions authors about misconceptions regarding separate artifact badges, emphasizing that credibility must be built into the paper and supplement for direct reviewer judgment. Guidelines are provided for matching the artifact (code, proofs, data) to the specific contribution type (Theory, ML, Optimization).

This guide helps writers structure academic syntheses to maintain rigorous objectivity, ensuring that the work summarizes the full spectrum of competing views rather than advocating for a single position. It details how to properly 'steelman' opposing arguments, weigh evidence impartially, separate positive findings from normative policy judgment, and honestly disclose areas of uncertainty.

Guides users through Connecticut divorce planning with nine operating modes from initial triage to post-judgment modification. Covers eligibility, financial affidavits, child support, alimony, parenting plans, settlement agreements, filing packets, and enforcement. Includes a strict UPL gate, safety escalation, and attorney-review reminders. Non-legal structured guidance grounded in C.G.S. Title 46b and CT Practice Book.

This skill provides a rigorous, verification-first methodology for all research concerning the Special Criminal Court (CPS) of the Central African Republic. It details the proper steps, fallback sources, and foundational legal texts required to cite judgments, decisions, and procedural documents accurately, ensuring compliance with international criminal justice standards and proper citation protocol.

Transform a legal professional's bounded knowledge, workflow, or judgment patterns into a safe, structured, and reusable AI skill. This tool processes inputs like legal memos, compliance checklists, or negotiation notes to extract core capabilities, risk taxonomies, and review standards. It strictly separates the extracted capability from the individual's personal voice or identity, ensuring full source traceability and mandatory human review points for high-stakes legal work.

This tool automates the cleanup and standardization of complex legal documents written in French (Word format). It distinguishes between deterministic corrections (typography, spacing, obvious errors) applied automatically, and context-sensitive revisions (judgment rewrites) that require intelligent human review. It generates a detailed, reversible registry of all changes, ensuring high accuracy for professional legal writing.

A verification-first guide for researching and citing legal documents related to the Special Panels for Serious Crimes (SPSC) in Timor-Leste. It outlines a rigorous, multi-step process for verifying judgments, indictments, and foundational UNTAET regulations, ensuring citations trace back to authoritative Tier 1 sources for post-conflict accountability and transitional justice.

A specialized Legal Project Management skill that transforms unstructured inputs (emails, call notes, trackers, etc.) into highly structured, client-facing status reports. It goes beyond formatting by applying expert judgment to identify actual progress versus mere activity, flagging risks, determining required next steps, and reconciling discrepancies between multiple sources (e.g., comparing email narrative against an Excel plan). Ideal for LPMs preparing updates for clients or internal stakeholders.

A rigorous, standalone tool designed for explicit, blind, and adversarial code review. It executes the code target through two parallel, independent judges (Judge A and Judge B) with strict rules and limited fix rounds. This process ensures maximum scrutiny, providing a definitive, highly corroborated verdict (APPROVED or ESCALATED) that replaces standard review methods.

Apply pragmatic programming rules inspired by Hunt and Thomas to improve engineering judgment, feedback loops, DRY knowledge, orthogonality, automation, and adaptability. Use this skill for design and code decisions requiring pragmatic engineering tradeoffs.