Skill UI

This skill guides researchers on how to structurally position a Marketing Science manuscript within its academic literature. It requires defining the model's baseline (modeling lineage) and the specific business problem it addresses (substantive stream). Crucially, it teaches how to frame the contribution as a concrete field gain rather than merely pointing out an existing knowledge gap.

This guide details the critical process of transforming an accepted, anonymous conference paper into its final, published, open-access version for the ACL Anthology. It covers the essential 'three-source merge' process: integrating reviewer-promised revisions, restoring author identity and community acknowledgements, correcting metadata, and managing conference logistics. Essential reading for authors submitting to top-tier NLP venues like NAACL.

A methodological guide for researchers on how to elevate the Chinese context from a mere background observation to a core theoretical variable. It outlines how to rigorously demonstrate that the local context alters the meaning of constructs, modifies causal mechanisms, or changes the boundary conditions of existing theories, ensuring the research contributes generalizable knowledge.

This plugin integrates the OpenViking context database, providing powerful long-term memory, session archiving, and semantic recall for OpenClaw agents. It enables agents to query, debug, and manage persistent knowledge bases, significantly enhancing conversational depth and complex tool usage.

This skill automates the complex process of transforming raw research papers (PDF or URL) into structured, knowledge graph-ready resources for OpenViking. It executes a rigorous workflow: reading the entire paper, compiling an ARA-style artifact directory, validating the content against established schemas, and finally ingesting the structured data into the OpenViking knowledge base using the `ov add-resource` command. It ensures all evidence, claims, and logical relationships are captured systematically.

This skill guides authors to structure and articulate the core contribution of a Production and Operations Management (POM) manuscript. It ensures that the research explicitly addresses both a knowledge gap (theory) and a practice gap (operational levers), helping bridge the gap between technical results and actionable managerial insight required by top academic venues.

This guide helps authors determine if their manuscript is suitable for submission to Progress in Aerospace Sciences. It emphasizes that the journal requires comprehensive, critical review articles that synthesize existing knowledge, rather than presenting original primary research, simulations, or experiments. Use this tool for fit assessment, scope definition, and structural re-framing before submission.

A specialized tool designed to help academic researchers evaluate the suitability of their manuscripts for the 'Research and Development Management' journal. It analyzes the paper's fit, theoretical framing, structural requirements, and potential weaknesses against the journal's focus on enterprise-level innovation mechanisms, knowledge management, and academic rigor. It simulates the journal's editorial review process.

This guide helps authors transform raw research results into a clear, theory-driven, and policy-relevant scholarly contribution. It focuses on articulating the 'Before $ ightarrow$ After' knowledge shift—what the field previously believed versus what the paper now proves—and ensuring the policy implication is logically earned from the estimated mechanism, rather than being a generic add-on.

This guide teaches authors how to properly position their research contribution within a specialized academic field, particularly for journals like Research Policy. It instructs users on how to move beyond simple citation lists by identifying a clear, theoretical knowledge gap (a tension) in the existing literature. By anchoring the work in foundational canons and naming the prevailing consensus, authors can structure a compelling argument that defines what the field should believe after reading the paper.

A comprehensive guide for authors transitioning from summarizing individual studies to synthesizing knowledge across a field. It teaches the critical, integrative voice required for publishing high-impact reviews, covering structure (Introduction Arc), methodology (APA 7), and critical argumentation (Synthesis vs. Summary). Essential for systematic literature reviews.

This guide provides an in-depth breakdown of the academic research paper review cycle, using top-tier database conferences (like SIGMOD) as a case study. It covers the double-anonymous review process, the author feedback phase, interpreting the Accept/Reject/Revise verdicts, and navigating the post-decision revision window and embargo rules. Essential knowledge for authors preparing submissions to top-tier conference proceedings.