Skill UI

A comprehensive guide to navigating the UIST (User Interface Software and Technology) academic review pipeline. It details every stage, from initial submission and expert review to the rebuttal phase and final committee decisions. The guide teaches authors how to critically analyze reviewer feedback, identify evidence gaps, strengthen novelty claims, and strategically plan for conditional acceptance or resubmission.

A comprehensive audit guide for the final pre-upload submission of UIST (User Interface Software and Technology) conference papers. This document details critical steps, including adhering to strict formatting rules (e.g., two-column layout, page limits), managing the abstract and paper deadlines, and executing thorough anonymity sweeps to prevent desk rejection. Essential reading for authors preparing for major academic conferences.

This comprehensive guide manages the end-to-end project lifecycle for submitting a systems paper to the UIST conference. It structures the demanding timeline, detailing milestones from abstract submission and hardware development to video production, rebuttal, and final camera-ready submission, while also providing crucial risk mitigation strategies.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting interactive system papers to UIST. It details the required narrative arc (walkthrough before mechanism), emphasizes technical specificity in implementation details, and provides rules for designing figures and structuring the argument within strict page limits.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors targeting the USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI). It helps in positioning complex systems research, covering core scope areas like operating systems, distributed systems, and cloud infrastructure. It details how to frame the contribution, build evidence (artifacts, baselines), and distinguish the work from similar top-tier venues like SOSP and NSDI.

Outlines the mandatory, multi-stage process for authors preparing final, camera-ready papers for USENIX Security. This guide covers critical post-acceptance steps, including de-anonymizing the manuscript, ensuring all mandated artifacts are permanently available (Open Science policy), updating ethical considerations, and meeting publication standards before final submission deadlines.

A comprehensive guide for positioning research papers for top-tier security conferences like USENIX Security. It covers defining coverage against 'Big-Four' and specialty venues, ensuring novelty across multi-cycle academic pipelines, identifying mechanism-level differentiators, and mastering double-blind citation mechanics for maximum impact.

This comprehensive guide details the academic submission lifecycle for USENIX Security. It maps out the multi-stage review pipeline, from initial submission through early rejection to final notification. It critically updates authors on the current decision vocabulary (e.g., Shepherd Approval, retired major revisions), emphasizing mandatory review foci like ethics adequacy, threat-model realism, and openness posture for strategic planning.

This comprehensive guide outlines the rigorous, multi-stage submission process for USENIX Security Symposium papers. It covers mandatory formatting rules, including the 13-page main body and required appendices for Ethical Considerations and Open Science. The guide also details critical steps for maintaining double-blind anonymity, managing complex HotCRP deadlines, and avoiding early rejection pitfalls.

This guide outlines the strict formatting and structural guidelines for submitting security conference papers (like USENIX Security). It helps authors determine which material—core mechanisms, proofs, or supplementary data—must remain in the main body to guarantee review visibility, versus what can be safely demoted to optional appendices or external artifacts.

This comprehensive guide provides an end-to-end planning framework for USENIX Security Symposium submissions. It assists researchers in selecting the optimal submission cycle, mapping backward timelines from key milestones (like registration), assigning ownership for venue-specific risks (e.g., ethics, reproducibility), and coordinating through the complex post-submission decision process (Accept/Reject).

A comprehensive guide detailing the standards for scientific reproducibility in visualization research, particularly for IEEE VIS submissions. It outlines the Graphics Replicability Stamp Initiative (GRSI) requirements, covering how independent volunteers must reproduce results using provided code, data, and environments (e.g., Docker containers). Learn how to package your work—including determinism aids, mapping tables, and licensed data—to pass rigorous, clean-machine testing.