Skill UI

This skill provides a detailed guide for author self-assessment, determining if a manuscript in theology, biblical studies, or religious history meets the high scholarly standards of top-tier academic journals (like the Harvard Theological Review). It emphasizes the necessity of strong textual criticism, philological rigor, and building arguments based on primary sources in original languages, ensuring the work is academically robust and methodologically sound.

A meticulous style guide for authors submitting papers to the International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT). It mandates a rigorous theorem-proof structure, emphasizing precise statement of data models, query languages, and complexity measures. The guide teaches how to structure the introduction to lead with the core result and its data-management implications, adhering to top-tier academic standards.

A comprehensive guide for researchers determining if their cross-layer systems work belongs at ASPLOS or a specialized venue (e.g., ISCA, SOSP, PLDI). It introduces the crucial "deletion test," a routing table based on core claims (microarchitecture, language design, etc.), and criteria for identifying genuine cross-disciplinary intersections between OS, PL, and Architecture.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising academic papers, particularly in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs). It teaches how to adopt the measurement-forward, evidence-based register required by top-tier conferences like COLM. Focus areas include leading with findings, strictly scoping claims to tested models and versions, structuring content for tight page limits, and maintaining a measured, critical voice.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers position their work in Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and Spoken Language Understanding (SLU) for the IEEE ASRU workshop. It covers conference fit assessment, manuscript re-framing strategies, understanding venue-specific evidence requirements (e.g., decoding, robustness analysis), and differentiating the contribution from related fields like Interspeech or SLT. Use this tool for submission strategy and academic positioning.

This guide assists authors targeting the IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) with conference positioning and manuscript re-framing. It provides deep insights into the required scope, evidence bar (e.g., speech-specific deployment, acoustic conditions), and narrative structure needed to successfully submit research in spoken language understanding, dialogue, and speech systems to top-tier CS venues.

A comprehensive guide for researchers targeting the International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG). This tool helps authors refine their manuscript by providing specific architectural advice on framing the contribution, establishing necessary evidence (e.g., rigorous evaluation, controllability metrics), and positioning the work correctly against related fields like dialogue and LLM generation. It ensures the paper meets the high standards expected by top NLP venues.

This skill guides authors on how to strategically position their research for the INTERSPEECH conference. It covers core topics such as speech recognition, synthesis, paralinguistics, and audio-language modeling. Use it to re-frame manuscripts from journal or arXiv styles into a selective CS conference narrative, ensuring the work meets the rigorous standards of audio-specific evaluation, datasets, and error analysis expected by the field.

This comprehensive guide outlines best practices for designing, evaluating, and reporting experimental results in speech processing research (ASR, TTS, Speaker Verification, etc.). It details required metrics (WER, MOS, EER), establishing robust baselines, conducting significance testing (bootstrap, CI), and ensuring comprehensive condition coverage (speakers, noise, languages) to enhance the scientific rigor of academic submissions.

This guide provides comprehensive rules for polishing scientific manuscripts to meet the rigorous standards of the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS). It focuses on refining language, ensuring structural clarity, standardizing nomenclature and units, and enforcing 'Claim Discipline' by replacing vague boosters (e.g., 'novel,' 'dramatically improved') with concrete data and quantitative evidence. Ideal for authors whose data is solid but whose prose requires academic refinement.

This skill polishes academic medical manuscripts to conform to the rigorous standards of major medical journals, such as JAMA, following the AMA Manual of Style. It focuses on refining prose by removing excessive jargon, correcting instances of overstatement ('spin'), replacing casual or causal language with scientifically accurate associational terms, and ensuring adherence to precise statistical and linguistic guidelines for maximum clarity and impact.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Development Economics (JDE) via Editorial Manager. This guide ensures compliance with route-specific limits (e.g., short-paper caps, full-length requirements), data replication readiness, single-anonymized review standards, and adherence to journal policies (e.g., language consistency, submission caps). Use it as the final check before submission.