Skill UI

A comprehensive framework designed for academic authors to assess whether their management or economics manuscript aligns with the scope and standards of specific high-impact journals. This skill guides users on critical elements such as theoretical contribution requirements, international framing, double-blind review rules, abstract length, and common rejection pitfalls, significantly increasing the chances of successful publication.

A comprehensive pre-submission guide for authors targeting high-caliber academic journals like Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It ensures compliance with critical publishing standards, covering abstract length limits (≤250 words), mandatory conference-version disclosures, generative AI declarations, and correct formatting (LaTeX/Word elsarticle). Use this checklist before submitting to Editorial Manager to minimize rejection risks.

This guide provides a comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting academic manuscripts to major journals (e.g., Wiley/Governance). It ensures compliance with critical submission requirements, including double-blind anonymization, strict word count limits, abstract length, Data Availability Statements, and adherence to specific scholarly scopes. Use this before hitting submit to minimize desk rejection risks and submission errors.

This skill guides users in refining and polishing academic manuscripts intended for high-impact international journals focused on public administration and political science. It teaches how to transform single-case studies into arguments with a broad, comparative scope, ensuring the core contribution is front-loaded and clearly articulated for a global audience. Use this when structuring the introduction, tightening prose, or conforming to strict journal guidelines (e.g., word caps, abstract length, double-blind submission).

This is a comprehensive audit checklist for submitting full-length research papers to the HRI conference. It guides authors through critical submission mechanics, including adhering to two-step deadlines (abstract then paper), selecting the correct technical track, managing formatting (8 pages, ACM template), ensuring double-blind anonymity across PDF, video, and data, and meeting human-participants ethics standards before final submission.

This skill polishes scholarly prose for academic manuscripts, particularly in Human Relations and social science. It focuses on elevating the writing from technically correct but flat drafts to a theoretically engaged, highly readable, and narratively compelling register. It guides users on structuring the argument (puzzle to generativity), refining prose (cutting nominalizations, using process voice), and adhering to strict academic constraints (abstract length, word caps, anonymity).

This guide helps authors structure lengthy academic manuscripts, ensuring the main text maintains a clear, focused narrative while relegating supportive, detailed evidence to the appendices or supplementary materials. It outlines the 'determinative' principle, advising where to place hyperparameters, extended experiments, proof details, and code links to meet high journal standards and maximize readability for reviewers.

A comprehensive guide for polishing sophisticated academic manuscripts, particularly those in Information Systems Research (ISR). This skill helps ensure the contribution is front-loaded, the structure is clear for diverse disciplinary audiences (behavioral, economic, design-science), and the formatting adheres to strict academic standards (e.g., INFORMS author-date style, abstract length limits). Ideal for late-stage editing passes before submission.

This comprehensive guide provides a meticulous preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to highly specialized academic journals, such as JAAR. It ensures adherence to strict double-blind anonymity, structural requirements (broad significance, length, abstract limits), and specific stylistic conventions, significantly reducing the chance of immediate rejection or return for revision before formal peer review.

This skill guides authors through the crucial decision of selecting the correct JACS format (Article or Communication). It provides detailed strategies for rightsizing the manuscript, determining what essential evidence belongs in the main text, and what detailed data should be moved to the Supplementary Information (SI), ensuring compliance with rigorous journal norms.

This comprehensive checklist guides academic authors through the final compliance checks for submitting a manuscript to the Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS). It covers critical elements such as double-blind anonymization, adherence to APA-6 formatting, confirming manuscript category and length budgeting, and ensuring the inclusion of required components like SEM matrices, minimizing the risk of administrative rejection.

A comprehensive pre-submission guide for authors targeting high-impact journals like JBF. It details complex requirements such as double anonymization, mandatory fees, separate title pages, abstract length constraints, data statements, and proper declaration of generative AI use, ensuring manuscripts are journal-compliant before hitting 'submit'.