Skill UI

A comprehensive project management skill designed for guiding the entire lifecycle of an ACM CCS conference submission. It maps out critical milestones, including abstract registration, full-paper upload, rebuttal periods, notification, and artifact evaluation. Users can utilize the backward-planning templates and 'big-four' deadline hopping strategies to manage complex academic deadlines effectively.

This comprehensive router guides users through the complete lifecycle of writing high-quality academic papers, specifically tailored to the standards of top financial and economic journals. It does not replace specialized skills but acts as a systematic workflow manager, helping users identify their current manuscript bottleneck and determining the optimal next step—from initial topic selection and literature review to advanced empirical identification and final rebuttal preparation.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end lifecycle for submitting a paper to the ACM CHI conference. It maps out critical milestones, including the initial submission deadline, the two-round review process, the crucial five-week revision window, camera-ready submission, and final publication. The guide also includes risk management strategies and fallback venues for rejected submissions, ensuring authors are prepared for every stage.

This skill acts as an orchestrator for interdisciplinary academic essays, guiding users through the entire writing lifecycle of a Critical Inquiry (CI) piece. It diagnoses the project stage, determines the appropriate format (Article, Critical Response, Review), and ensures the core argument is centered on a strong, interdisciplinary theoretical intervention, preventing content drift and structural gaps.

A comprehensive guide for authors navigating the academic publication lifecycle, covering strategies for rebuttal windows, camera-ready revisions, and resubmission briefs for top-tier conferences. Learn how to structure arguments, maintain anonymity, focus on evidence, and calibrate tone to effectively address reviewer concerns in different submission scenarios.

This comprehensive workflow guides researchers through the entire academic publication lifecycle for submissions to the Chinese Journal of Management Science. It acts as a critical router, ensuring manuscripts cover essential stages: topic selection, advanced model formulation, algorithm design, empirical validation (out-of-sample testing), and generating actionable managerial insights. It helps prevent common pitfalls like lacking empirical depth or misaligning with the journal's core focus on applied modeling.

This tool serves as an orchestrator for authors preparing submissions to Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier). It guides users through the entire research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and theoretical formalization to study design, data analysis, and open science practices. It emphasizes structuring the contribution as a model-driven, multi-experiment program, ensuring all necessary steps, including code transparency, are addressed.

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous submission process for major academic conferences like COLM. It covers strict formatting rules (e.g., 9-page limit), maintaining double-blind anonymity, mandatory LLM usage disclosure, and techniques for preventing identity leaks through technical sweeps. Essential reading for authors navigating the complex academic publishing lifecycle.

A comprehensive project management framework for authors submitting theoretical papers to major conferences (e.g., COLT). This guide outlines the entire lifecycle, emphasizing backward planning from the deadline, milestone setting (Result Freeze, Verification Pass), and critical quality checks, including proof assembly, anonymity sweeps, and rebuttal response. It is designed to mitigate common academic writing risks and ensure a robust submission process.

This skill serves as the central orchestrator for Communication Research (CR) manuscripts. It guides users through the entire academic publishing lifecycle, assessing whether a manuscript is quantitative, theory-driven, and methodologically sound. It routes the user to the appropriate specialized sub-skill (e.g., design, analysis, theory-building) based on the study type (experiment, survey, content analysis) and the current stage of the research process.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for academic manuscripts submitted to Conservation Biology. It guides authors through the entire scientific writing lifecycle, helping them determine the appropriate article type (e.g., Review, Essay, Contributed Paper) and the necessary sequence of sub-skills (from study design to data analysis and relevance checks). It ensures the final work has direct, transferable implications for the conservation of biological diversity.

This comprehensive orchestrator guides authors through the entire manuscript lifecycle for Comparative Political Studies (CPS). It is designed to ensure that the paper maintains a genuinely comparative argument—across countries, regions, or time—at every stage, routing the user to the correct next skill (e.g., theory building, research design, data analysis). It does not generate content; it directs the scholarly workflow.