Skill UI

This skill performs in-depth literature reviews across complex communications domains, including 5G/6G, Wi-Fi, satellite networking, and advanced protocols. It systematically searches user-defined knowledge bases (Zotero, Obsidian, local files) and major academic databases (IEEE, ACM, ScienceDirect) to provide comprehensive survey summaries, related work analyses, and technical landscape overviews.

A comprehensive knowledge-base-first skill designed for deep literature reviews in advanced communication domains. Use it for topics like 4G/5G/6G, wireless networking, satellite communications, Wi-Fi, routing protocols, and cross-layer optimization. It systematically searches structured academic databases (IEEE, ACM, Zotero, etc.) to provide related work, survey papers, and landscape summaries.

Draft a structured, reviewer-ready grant proposal from research ideas and literature. Supports KAKENHI, NSF, NSFC, ERC, DFG, SNSF, ARC and NWO formats, with narrative, aims, budget and timeline planning.

A specialized tool for searching published, peer-reviewed academic papers from major venues like IEEE, ACM, and Springer. Unlike preprint services (like arXiv), this skill provides verified citation counts, detailed venue metadata, and filtering options for finding established, high-impact research literature. Ideal for formal academic research and literature reviews.

Provides REST API access to PubMed for building advanced Boolean/MeSH queries, filtering by publication details, and programmatically fetching citations through E-utilities, making it ideal for systematic reviews and automated literature workflows.

Generates structured peer-review quality critiques of academic papers, covering summaries, methodology scrutiny, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and recommendations across domains whenever a user requests reviews, analyses, or summaries of research publications.

This technique is designed for advanced academic research, enabling users to search for theses by running two parallel tracks: a Topic Track (focusing on discipline, methodology, and materials) and a People Track (focusing on university, advisor, degree type, and year). By switching between these two methodologies, users can cross-validate results and significantly improve the accuracy and completeness of their literature review.

A comprehensive mentor for graduate students and early-career researchers, guiding the entire research lifecycle. This skill covers formulating rigorous research questions, designing studies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods), conducting literature reviews, analyzing data, and writing publishable papers. It emphasizes methodological rigor, critical thinking, and ethical considerations.

Searches BGPT scientific papers by topic or DOI and retrieves claim-level evidence extracted from full text, including experiments, reported statistics, scope, limitations, and provenance. Supports literature reviews and evidence synthesis.

An autonomous research agent that plans complex investigations using Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs). It executes sub-questions in parallel, performs gap analysis, and iteratively refines findings before synthesizing a comprehensive, structured report. Ideal for deep market analysis, academic literature reviews, or complex problem-solving requiring multiple data sources.

A comprehensive mentor guiding users through the entire lifecycle of academic literature reviews. It teaches systematic search strategies (PICO/PCC), critical appraisal methods, and advanced synthesis techniques. The skill covers searching major English and Chinese databases (e.g., PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI), organizing findings, and effectively utilizing AI research tools like Elicit and Semantic Scholar to build robust, evidence-based research papers.

Conduct comprehensive systematic literature reviews across biomedical and scientific domains using multiple academic databases. Synthesize findings, verify citations, and generate professional markdown or PDF documents. Includes AI-generated scientific schematics for visual enhancement. Ideal for research synthesis, meta-analyses, and thesis writing.