Skill UI

A comprehensive checklist for authors preparing to submit academic conference papers. This guide details mandatory final audits covering double-blind anonymity, ethical compliance, formatting standards, conflict declarations, and the strict submission timeline, ensuring the paper passes pre-upload quality gates.

A comprehensive preflight guide for authors submitting academic manuscripts to journals via platforms like Sage Track. This checklist ensures compliance with mandatory journal requirements, including word count targets, abstract structure, anonymous masking techniques, SAGE Harvard referencing, and critical ethical/data availability statements. Use this before any final upload.

This guide outlines the rigorous standards for writing top-tier distributed systems conference papers. It details the mandatory narrative arc—moving from an operational pain point to a named design principle—and emphasizes that every claim must be supported by precise, measured evidence (e.g., percentiles and specific workloads) rather than relying on superlatives or vague adjectives. It also provides guidance on structuring the argument, budgeting page space, and designing figures as core evidence.

This guide provides a framework for designing and auditing the experimental rigor of academic papers, particularly in systems and programming languages. It emphasizes the crucial link between a claim type (e.g., 'Faster') and the required evidence type (e.g., benchmarks, user studies, formal proofs). Learn how to establish robust baselines, define clear workload rules, size experiments for conference cycles, and ensure statistical compliance for maximum impact.

This guide helps researchers evaluate whether their high-impact optics or photonics manuscript meets the stringent criteria of Optica. It covers ideal scope (e.g., nanophotonics, quantum optics), required experimental rigor (quantitative measurements, state-of-the-art benchmarking), article structure (concise, load-bearing figures), and official submission guidelines, ensuring the work is framed for broad scientific interest.

A comprehensive late-stage review pass designed for academic manuscripts targeting Organization Science. This skill ensures the paper effectively front-loads the core argument and contribution, translating complex ideas for an interdisciplinary, micro-to-macro audience. It enforces strict adherence to INFORMS house style, structural rigor, and cross-level consistency.

A comprehensive checklist designed for authors submitting manuscripts to academic journals, specifically modeled after the requirements for Organization Studies (OS). It covers critical steps such as ensuring proper double-anonymization, adhering to strict word limits (e.g., 13,000 words), formatting guidelines (SAGE Harvard), and structuring abstracts and keywords. This tool ensures the manuscript is submission-ready before the final upload.

A comprehensive guide for structuring academic system evaluation papers (e.g., OSDI). It dictates how to frame experiments around core research questions, select robust baselines, utilize realistic workloads (including adversarial tests), and apply rigorous measurement disciplines (e.g., reporting distributions, p99s) while maintaining conciseness within strict page limits.

Provides a rigorous framework for ensuring the reproducibility of systems research presented at conferences like OSDI. It mandates maintaining a comprehensive, machine-readable provenance ledger that records hardware specifications, software dependencies, workload traces, and measurement policies throughout the entire experimental lifecycle, preventing 'artifact drift' and ensuring verifiable results.

A comprehensive pre-upload audit checklist for authors submitting to OSDI conferences. This guide meticulously covers critical rules, including strict page limits (12 pages), mandatory anonymization techniques (institution and system names), adherence to specific submission deadlines, and best practices for managing HotCRP field data to ensure a flawless submission.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting to academic journals, specifically modeled after the requirements for Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) via SAGE Track. It guides users through critical steps, including maintaining double-anonymity, confirming the genre (review article vs. empirical study), adhering to strict word counts (~8,000 words), and following specific style guides (SAGE Harvard). Use this tool immediately before the final upload to ensure submission compliance.

This guide helps researchers develop the core, load-bearing conceptual apparatus necessary for a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay. It teaches how to move beyond mere summaries or thematic groupings by identifying, refining, importing, or coining a singular, portable concept that re-orders the literature and drives a powerful, original argument.