Skill UI

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors responding to major conference reviews (like IEEE VIS). It details the distinct strategies for both first-round rebuttals and mandatory second-round revisions (conditional accept). Learn how to structure summaries of changes, address technical critiques, maintain anonymity, and turn reviewer skepticism into acceptance.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to WACV, detailing the strategic differences between the optional one-page Round 1 rebuttal and the mandatory change summary accompanying a Revise-and-Resubmit. It provides best practices for addressing reviewer concerns, maintaining anonymity, and accurately documenting revisions.

This guide outlines the mandatory requirements for authors publishing quantitative or mixed-method research in academic journals. It details the process of creating a complete replication package—including raw data, master scripts, seeds, and extensive README documentation—and depositing it in a trusted data repository (like Dataverse). It ensures scholarly rigor by guaranteeing that published findings are fully reproducible and traceable.

A comprehensive checklist for authors submitting to academic law journals, specifically tailored for The Yale Law Journal (YLJ). It guides users through critical pre-upload steps, including mandatory anonymization checks, adhering to strict length caps (Article, Essay, Forum), verifying Bluebook citation apparatus, and ensuring the use of the official submission portal. This tool helps prevent common submission failures before the final upload.

A comprehensive white-box security auditing workflow designed for proprietary source code. It integrates static analysis security testing (SAST) tools like Semgrep and CodeQL to detect common vulnerabilities (e.g., injection, IDOR, crypto misuse), followed by mandatory manual threat modeling and verification steps. Applicable for PR reviews and pre-deployment security checks.

Provides decision support for mapping diagnoses and procedures extracted by OpenMed to standardized ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS codes. This skill suggests candidate codes along with detailed clinical rationale, helping human coders narrow down options, route findings to specific chapters, and pre-fill encounter records. Note that the output is advisory and requires mandatory validation by a certified medical coder.

This skill facilitates the extraction of population-scale (cohort-level) clinical text from Electronic Health Records (EHR) or FHIR data warehouses using the FHIR Bulk Data Access ($export) operation. It manages the asynchronous job kickoff, polling, and downloading of NDJSON files. The resulting data stream is designed to be fed in batches into OpenMed for mandatory de-identification and Named Entity Recognition (NER) analysis.

A comprehensive guide for auditing and polishing original long-form manuscripts intended for submission to high-level Pattern Recognition and AI journals. It details mandatory components, formatting standards, anti-plagiarism checks, and ethical guidelines, ensuring the paper meets rigorous peer-review standards for publication.

This skill structures free-text adverse event narratives into the mandatory ICH E2B(R3) format. It populates critical fields required for regulatory submissions (like FAERS/EudraVigilance), including suspect drugs, reactions (mapped via MedDRA), seriousness criteria, and reaction outcomes. Use it when generating Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) from clinical narratives.

This skill helps refine a raw concept into a complete, professional talk pitch. It generates multiple strategic angles, analyzes their strengths and weaknesses, suggests compelling titles, and drafts both short abstracts and long CFP descriptions. A mandatory checkpoint ensures the user selects the optimal narrative path before finalization, making it ideal for conference submission preparation.

This skill validates FHIR R4 resources and Bundles against mandatory US Core profiles (USCDI). It goes beyond mere syntactic checks to ensure that data prepared for submission to major Electronic Health Records (EHRs) like Epic or Cerner meets the required US-specific conformance standards. It detects common data gaps, checks 'must-support' elements, and converts the comprehensive validation report into a standard FHIR OperationOutcome for seamless pipeline integration.

This comprehensive guide provides a detailed checklist for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to the Journal on Communications (JOC). It covers all structural requirements, including correct article sequence (Chinese/English), abstract structure, keyword count, mandatory identifiers (e.g., TN classification), adherence to GB/T 7714 referencing, and plagiarism checks (CNKI > 20% threshold). It also outlines the academic process, fees, and submission ethics, ensuring the paper meets the journal's rigorous three-stage review standard.