Skill UI

This skill guides researchers on how to structurally position a Marketing Science manuscript within its academic literature. It requires defining the model's baseline (modeling lineage) and the specific business problem it addresses (substantive stream). Crucially, it teaches how to frame the contribution as a concrete field gain rather than merely pointing out an existing knowledge gap.

This comprehensive guide assists authors in developing rigorous methodology sections for academic papers in Marketing Science. It covers advanced techniques such as structural econometrics, causal ML, dynamic games, and quasi-experiments. Key focus areas include ensuring model identifiability, specifying estimators (GMM, MLE), and rigorously defending exogeneity assumptions.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous review process for academic manuscripts, specifically focusing on the standards used by top-tier journals like Marketing Science. It explains the double-anonymous review structure, what editors and reviewers prioritize (e.g., model fit, originality, counterfactual validity), and how to correctly interpret decision letters (Reject, Revise & Resubmit, Conditional). Use this before submission or when preparing a rebuttal.

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors submitting a Marketing Science manuscript via ScholarOne. It details critical steps including manuscript anonymization for double-anonymous review, selecting the correct article track (Regular, Frontiers, Practice), adherence to strict formatting rules, assembling a robust replication package (code and data access), and managing all submission requirements.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and generating core exhibits—including estimates, model-fit, comparative statics, and counterfactuals—for academic manuscripts in Marketing Science. Designed to adhere to rigorous academic house styles (e.g., INFORMS), ensuring model mechanisms and policy implications are clearly and rigorously presented to quantitative reviewers.

A guide for transforming abstract marketing phenomena into rigorous, mathematically testable models. It covers both analytical (game-theoretic) and structural econometric approaches, emphasizing the specification of primitives, deriving equilibria, and establishing clear identification arguments for academic research.

This skill guides researchers through a rigorous two-part assessment process: first, confirming the substantive importance of a marketing phenomenon; and second, verifying that the question is modelable using formal analytical or structural econometric techniques. It helps determine the ideal target journal (e.g., Marketing Science, JCR, JMR) by evaluating the core contribution and required methodology, ensuring the research aligns with specific academic standards and counterfactual requirements.

This guide serves as a comprehensive workflow router for authors preparing a Marketing Science manuscript. It dictates the sequential steps, from identifying a modeling-worthy topic and developing a structural or analytical model, through data analysis, contribution framing, and final submission. It ensures the paper maintains a focus on formal modeling and managerial counterfactuals, adhering to the journal's rigorous standards.

This guide provides a detailed checklist and structural framework for polishing Marketing Science manuscripts. It emphasizes leading with clear business intuition over complex notation, adhering to INFORMS house style (citations, formatting, length), and ensuring the paper is submission-ready. Use this skill during the late-stage review process when the model and core arguments are finalized.

This guide outlines the scope, theoretical expectations, and methodological requirements for submitting high-quality academic research to the Nankai Business Review. It targets studies in strategic management, organizational behavior (OB), HRM, and marketing that build management theory grounded in the Chinese context, requiring strong theoretical contribution and rigorous empirical or qualitative methods.

This specialized skill is designed for creating investor pitch decks for various funding rounds (Seed, Series A/B/C). It builds upon standard presentation rules, adding critical VC-focused constraints such as stage-appropriate metrics, the canonical narrative arc (Problem -> Solution -> Market -> Ask), and finance-grade number conventions. Use this only when actively raising capital, not for general reviews.

This tool guides authors writing on industrial organization, market structure, regulation, and antitrust. It provides a rigorous framework for evaluating whether a manuscript meets the high standards of top-tier IO journals by assessing theoretical models, empirical identification, and policy significance. Use it for venue selection and manuscript re-framing.