Skill UI

This skill provides deep, decision-grade research dossiers on any specific entity (company, person, or organization). Unlike generic profiles, it mandates the user to state a clear hypothesis upfront. The resulting dossier rigorously tests this hypothesis, providing a conclusive verdict, detailed activity timelines, network signals, red flags, and a source-provenance audit log. Ideal for due diligence, investment analysis, or high-stakes meeting preparation.

This tool streamlines the entire meeting preparation lifecycle. By integrating Notion context, performing targeted searches, and enriching content with Codex research, users can draft structured agendas, pre-reads, and decision documents. It ensures all necessary background information, owners, timeboxes, and industry insights are compiled for highly effective meetings.

A comprehensive audit checklist designed to guide authors through the rigorous preparation process for submitting academic manuscripts to Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It covers critical steps such as adopting double-blind anonymity, mandatory author commitment forms, ensuring originality, and meeting the high formatting standards required for top-tier publications in control and automation theory.

A comprehensive final checklist designed for academic researchers preparing manuscripts for scholarly journal submission (e.g., double-blind review processes). This guide ensures adherence to complex publisher standards, covering mandatory elements such as complete manuscript anonymization, drafting the Data Availability Statement (DAS), assembling replication packages for statistical work, and meeting strict formatting and word count requirements. Use this before final upload to avoid avoidable desk returns.

Guides authors on meeting the rigorous transparency standards required by the European Sociological Review (ESR). It details how to prepare a Data Availability Statement (DAS) and a replication package for statistical and computational manuscripts. The guide covers everything from documenting data sources and versions to handling restricted administrative data, ensuring that the research process is fully reproducible and traceable.

A comprehensive audit checklist for preparing research submissions for FSE. This guide covers critical steps including meeting two-stage deadlines (registration and submission), adhering to strict ACM formatting and page budgets, ensuring heavy double-anonymous anonymity by scrubbing all metadata leaks, and fulfilling open science requirements with Data Availability statements. Essential for authors ensuring their manuscript meets high academic standards.

This guide details the academic review process for HPCA, including the double-blind review format, the structure of the single combined rebuttal/revision window, and the dynamics of program-committee meetings. Use this to set clear expectations, predict outcomes, and strategically prepare your rebuttal to maximize your paper's chances of acceptance.

A comprehensive audit guide for authors preparing submissions for the International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT). This guide covers critical aspects including selecting the correct submission cycle, adhering to the two-step abstract-then-paper deadline, meeting the LIPIcs formatting standards (15 pages excluding references), ensuring complete and verifiable proofs, and maintaining strict anonymity since 2024. Use this before uploading to Microsoft CMT.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous, multi-stage process required to transform an accepted conference submission into a publishable "camera-ready" manuscript for IEEE Xplore. It covers crucial steps including adhering to strict page limits (e.g., 8 pages), de-anonymizing content, ensuring metadata compliance via PaperPlaza, completing the IEEE electronic copyright transfer (eCF), and meeting registration requirements for final archival.

A comprehensive guide for researchers on preparing, archiving, and declaring the availability of research artifacts (datasets, code, and platforms) for academic publication. It details best practices for provenance tracking, ensuring reproducibility, and meeting the standards required for community contribution awards.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing camera-ready papers for the INTERSPEECH conference. It covers critical steps like de-anonymizing content, ensuring accurate metadata linking (DOI/ISCA Archive), meeting author registration requirements for proceedings inclusion, and planning oral or poster presentations.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors submitting to the Journal of Econometrics (JoE). It details the required best practices for data citation (using the Elsevier `[dataset]` format), ensuring methodological reproducibility (e.g., Monte Carlo simulations), and preparing estimators as runnable code packages (R, Python, etc.). This guide is essential for meeting rigorous academic publication standards and passing peer review.