Skill UI

Provides detailed guidelines for creating high-standard clinical figures and tables, modeled after leading medical journals (e.g., The Lancet). It covers essential display items including Table 1 (baseline characteristics), Kaplan-Meier survival curves (with numbers-at-risk), Forest plots for meta-analyses, CONSORT/PRISMA flow diagrams, and global maps. The guide emphasizes the rigorous reporting of 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and proper statistical methods to ensure scientific accuracy.

This skill guides the planning and auditing of analysis for linguistic manuscripts to ensure evidence supports theoretical claims. It covers quantitative modeling like mixed-effects models in R, phonetic measurement, and corpus statistics. It helps establish the analytic trail from raw data to generalization without fabricating results. It ensures proper statistical specification, effect size reporting, and handling of uncertainty, aligning with academic standards for credibility in language research.

A comprehensive skill designed to help researchers assess whether a manuscript is suitable for submission to the prestigious journal, Macroeconomics. It covers the journal's scope (macro-policy, growth, regional strategy), required methodological rigor (econometrics, model transparency), structural expectations, and common pitfalls, acting as a pre-submission positioning and rewriting framework.

A comprehensive guide and tool for assessing manuscript fit for the Chinese academic journal, *Management Science* (published by HIT). It helps researchers determine if their work meets the journal's requirements, especially regarding quantitative methods, model setting, structured argument, and adherence to specific word count and formatting rules. It assists in optimizing the narrative for high-level management and engineering science publications.

This guide teaches researchers how to structure and articulate the contribution of a mathematical finance manuscript. It advises authors to move beyond simply proving a theorem, instead focusing on framing the methodological novelty and its direct payoff to financial modeling problems like pricing, hedging, risk management, and portfolio choice. It ensures the paper is seen as relevant to practitioners, not just mathematicians.

Performs a comprehensive security audit of Model Context Protocol (MCP) implementations, including servers, clients, and tools. This skill reviews code against critical security baselines (MCP-01 to MCP-05), OWASP MCP Top 10, and common Remote Code Execution (RCE) vectors (e.g., command injection, deserialization, SSRF). The output provides a detailed report with file and line references, ensuring compliance and identifying vulnerabilities before release. Use this when auditing network-exposed services or client security posture.

This guide assists researchers in selecting and rigorously defending the appropriate methodology for Management Science (INFORMS) manuscripts. It covers both analytical modeling approaches (e.g., optimization, stochastic processes, game theory) and empirical designs (e.g., quasi-experiments, field trials). It ensures the chosen design not only matches the research question but also meets strict departmental standards and generates decision-relevant managerial insights.

A comprehensive guide for structuring the theoretical core of academic papers in Management Science. It covers two main approaches: developing formal analytical models (assumptions, propositions, comparative statics) or generating robust empirical hypotheses based on explicit mechanisms. The goal is always to derive decision-relevant, cross-departmental insights.

This guide provides a rigorous framework for evaluating computer architecture designs. It covers critical steps including selecting the appropriate simulation instrument (from analytical models to silicon measurements), constructing robust baselines, performing ablation studies, and reporting comprehensive metrics like geomeans and full overhead accounting to ensure scientific validity.

A comprehensive guide for microarchitecture researchers on achieving rigorous scientific reproducibility. It mandates tracking every critical artifact—including simulator commits, workload traces, power/area models, and RTL toolchains—and compiling them into a single run manifest, ensuring any reported result can be verified by a third party.

A comprehensive model detailing the entire academic review pipeline for microarchitecture papers, anchored to major conferences like MICRO. It outlines the timeline, from initial submission and double-blind review through the rebuttal/revision window, to final notification. The guide details what expert reviewers focus on—including mechanism novelty, methodology credibility, and cost honesty—providing authors with actionable strategies for strengthening their work through the academic publication lifecycle.

This guide teaches rigorous conceptual analysis essential for analytic philosophy. It helps users define key terms precisely, draw clear distinctions between similar concepts, identify logical fallacies (like equivocation), and select the most appropriate philosophical method (e.g., conceptual analysis, thought experiments, formal modeling). Use it when an argument requires heightened precision and structural integrity.