Skill UI

A comprehensive methodology guide for designing rigorous multi-country or cross-cultural studies, essential for international marketing research. It covers critical steps such as country selection criteria, ensuring construct, translation, and sampling equivalence, and planning for measurement invariance (MGCFA). It guides researchers through advanced designs including cross-cultural experiments, multi-level estimation, and handling secondary export/entry-mode data.

A comprehensive checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to the Journal of International Marketing (JIM). This guide details the mandatory requirements for the multi-file submission package, covering proper anonymization (double-blind review), adherence to specific formatting rules (e.g., double-spacing, page limits), and the step-by-step process for using the ScholarOne submission portal.

This router skill guides researchers through the complex, multi-stage process of developing and submitting high-quality manuscripts for the Journal of International Marketing (JIM). It helps users navigate crucial steps, from initial topic selection and theory development (ensuring the international dimension is theoretical, not just setting) to rigorous methods design, data analysis (including invariance testing), and final submission preparation. It serves as a structural map for academic writing in international marketing.

This skill guides authors through the rigorous academic publication review process. It details the multi-stage steps—from initial intake screening (identifying data dumps or parochialism) to double-anonymous external review—to help authors predict potential reviewer objections, understand the likely outcome, and strategically strengthen the manuscript structure before submission.

This guide details the complex, multi-stage review process for high-level academic journals, such as Management Science. It explains critical stages like department-specific desk screening, double-anonymous refereeing, and assessing cross-departmental fit. It is essential for authors who need to understand how submissions are evaluated, interpret rejection letters (e.g., fit vs. rigor), and plan their next steps for revision or re-aiming.

This guide provides a rigorous, multi-gate audit checklist for submitting academic conference papers. It covers critical steps from adhering to strict deadlines and formatting rules (e.g., page limits, templates) to passing complex anonymity checks (double-blind review), and ensuring policy compliance (e.g., plagiarism, resubmission bans). Use this checklist before your final submission.

This skill allows agents to retrieve and inject relevant operational memories from the OpenViking experience library into the current prompt context. It is designed for complex, multi-step tasks involving tool usage, code operations, or decision-making workflows. By searching and reading past successful executions, the agent improves context awareness and decision accuracy, moving beyond simple Q&A.

A comprehensive guide detailing the multi-stage academic review pipeline for The RAND Journal of Economics (RJE). It explains the critical steps—from the initial editor screening and potential desk reject, through two anonymous peer reviews, to the final handling editor decision. This guide provides actionable strategies on structuring the manuscript, crafting the cover letter, and framing the Industrial Organization (IO) contribution to maximize acceptance chances.

This toolkit guides the entire academic publishing lifecycle, acting as a central router across multiple venues. It sequences critical steps—from selecting the ideal target journal (`rt-journal-match`) through data execution, submission readiness checks, simulated referee review, point-by-point rebuttal drafting, and generating the final replication package. It provides a structured, end-to-end process for researchers submitting complex manuscripts.

A comprehensive guide for authors transitioning an accepted paper from a full draft to the strict, camera-ready proceedings format required by major conferences like SODA. It covers critical steps such as content compression, de-anonymization (restoring author metadata), adhering to SIAM formatting rules, and establishing proper citation hygiene across multiple versions (proceedings, arXiv, journal).

Outlines the mandatory, multi-stage process for authors preparing final, camera-ready papers for USENIX Security. This guide covers critical post-acceptance steps, including de-anonymizing the manuscript, ensuring all mandated artifacts are permanently available (Open Science policy), updating ethical considerations, and meeting publication standards before final submission deadlines.

This comprehensive guide outlines the rigorous, multi-stage submission process for USENIX Security Symposium papers. It covers mandatory formatting rules, including the 13-page main body and required appendices for Ethical Considerations and Open Science. The guide also details critical steps for maintaining double-blind anonymity, managing complex HotCRP deadlines, and avoiding early rejection pitfalls.