Skill UI

Provides a structured workflow for revising academic manuscripts based on feedback from the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) editor. This guide focuses on improving accessibility, narrative balance, framing, and overall structure for a broad, non-specialist audience. It helps authors plan the revisions and draft a professional, collaborative reply letter to the editorial team.

This router guides authors through the entire process of developing a compelling, non-technical synthesis article for a broad audience, specifically for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). It determines the optimal next skill to use—whether focusing on topic selection, narrative structure, improving accessibility, ensuring balance, or drafting the initial proposal—ensuring the final product reads as an accessible essay rather than a specialized research paper.

This guide helps writers polish academic manuscripts to conform to the engaging, clear, and authoritative style of the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). Focuses on transforming dense, passive, jargon-heavy prose into plain-language narratives suitable for a broad, non-specialist academic audience. Ideal for refining abstracts, opening paragraphs, and improving overall voice structure.

This guide teaches researchers how to structure and frame academic papers, specifically for journals focusing on financial intermediation. It emphasizes moving the contribution narrative away from general finance concepts and anchoring it firmly in the roles of institutions, economic friction, causal mechanisms, and policy consequences within the financial system. Use this to strengthen abstracts and introduction paragraphs.

This guide provides rigorous conventions for constructing self-contained tables and figures for submissions to high-tier finance journals (e.g., JFI). It focuses on structuring exhibits—such as sample construction, event studies, and fixed-effect regressions—to make complex econometric findings accessible and persuasive to banking and intermediation specialists. It guides the visual narrative, ensuring every exhibit is self-sufficient and methodologically transparent.

A specialized guide for polishing academic manuscripts in financial microstructure, particularly for submissions to top journals like JFM. It teaches authors how to shift from general finance narratives to precise, technically detailed writing that focuses on market mechanics, institutional rules, and quantifying results in market units (e.g., basis points, depth). Ideal for late-stage drafting to ensure maximum impact and credibility.

This comprehensive framework guides financial researchers in structuring high-quality literature reviews for academic manuscripts. It moves beyond mere citation listing by enforcing a three-part narrative structure: tracing the global theoretical and mechanistic origins, contextualizing the discussion within local Chinese institutional settings, and precisely defining the novel contribution (the research gap). Mastering this process ensures a deep, scholarly dialogue between international theory and local empirical evidence.

This skill provides comprehensive guidelines for revising and polishing academic manuscripts, specifically tailored for submission to top-tier journals like the Journal of International Marketing (JIM). It ensures structural integrity, refining the abstract to 200 words, tightening the introduction's narrative arc, and elevating the prose to eliminate stereotypes and maintain rigorous theoretical language, adhering to AMA conventions.

This guide helps authors refine academic prose for institutional and organizational economics journals. It teaches how to structure the narrative to open with an institutional puzzle, clearly name the underlying mechanism, and frame the contribution as a delta on a specific frontier, ensuring the focus remains on governance and organizational forms rather than just data or models.

This guide helps authors refine their academic manuscripts for submission to the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB). It focuses on transforming technically correct but policy-distant writing into a compelling narrative that clearly articulates the economic stakes, policy implications, and magnitude of findings for central bankers and regulators. Ideal for late-stage polishing.

This skill guides the process of drafting and polishing academic manuscripts, particularly for journals adhering to the APA 7th edition style. It focuses on ensuring the theoretical contribution is clear, maintaining a structured narrative arc (Introduction, Theory, Method, Results, Discussion), and achieving high levels of rigor. It polishes prose, tightens structure, and ensures statistical reporting includes effect sizes and confidence intervals, without inventing content.

This guide provides a structured framework for authors responding to Major Revision (R&R) decisions from high-tier academic journals like JOM. It emphasizes moving beyond simple point-by-point responses to prioritize the Department Editor's decisive concerns, resolving deep empirical method-check issues (e.g., endogeneity), and maintaining a clear, operations-focused narrative across multiple revision rounds.