Skill UI

Recreate the modern, frosted glass aesthetic of macOS notification banners. This template is ideal for adding polished, system-like alerts to video overlays, product launch videos, or social media announcements. It features structured content areas for app icons, titles, and detailed text, mimicking the native OS look and feel.

A comprehensive utility for managing complex cmux topologies, including workspaces, panes, and surfaces. This tool is essential for inspecting, controlling, and monitoring multiple AI coding agents running in parallel within a macOS terminal environment. It supports advanced functionalities such as browser automation and real-time status notifications, optimizing developer workflows.

Design and implement a unified operational workflow for managing notifications sourced from disparate tools like GitHub, Linear, local hooks, and chat platforms. This skill addresses notification fragmentation, alert noise, and redundancy by establishing clear severity levels, ownership, routing channels, and next operational actions into a single, cohesive pipeline.

A structured tool for sending critical, warning, or informational alerts to internal teams via Slack or Intercom. Ideal for pushing campaign status updates, performance metric alerts, or formal approval requests to stakeholders. It supports advanced features like tiered urgency flagging, context embedding (IDs, metrics), and mandatory execution approval, ensuring all internal communication is documented and actionable.

A comprehensive project management skill designed for guiding the entire lifecycle of an ACM CCS conference submission. It maps out critical milestones, including abstract registration, full-paper upload, rebuttal periods, notification, and artifact evaluation. Users can utilize the backward-planning templates and 'big-four' deadline hopping strategies to manage complex academic deadlines effectively.

A comprehensive guide detailing the entire academic life cycle for submitting to ITCS. It outlines the critical single annual cycle—from abstract submission in early September through review, notification, and final conference presentation in January. Learn how to plan backward from the deadline, especially focusing on strategies for the no-rebuttal format, ensuring your paper preemptively answers reviewer objections.

A comprehensive model detailing the entire academic review pipeline for microarchitecture papers, anchored to major conferences like MICRO. It outlines the timeline, from initial submission and double-blind review through the rebuttal/revision window, to final notification. The guide details what expert reviewers focus on—including mechanism novelty, methodology credibility, and cost honesty—providing authors with actionable strategies for strengthening their work through the academic publication lifecycle.

This comprehensive guide provides a structured workflow for academic submissions to the NDSS security symposium. It maps out the distinct summer and fall submission cycles, detailing critical milestones from the initial paper deadline through early-reject, rebuttal, notification, and final camera-ready stages. It emphasizes strategic backward planning, managing the sensitive disclosure clock for vulnerabilities, and positioning research within the broader security research lifecycle.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end annual workflow for submitting to an academic conference. This resource covers critical milestones, including abstract registration, full-paper submission, review notification, and camera-ready preparation. It emphasizes strategic planning—such as timing proof completion and deciding between paper tracks—to maximize the chances of successful publication.

A comprehensive, backward-scheduled workflow guide for preparing submissions to top-tier theoretical computer science conferences like POPL. It maps out critical academic milestones, detailing the journey from initial core theorem stabilization (16+ weeks out) through the July submission deadline, October notification, mandatory artifact evaluation, and final January presentation. Includes strategies for contingency planning and retargeting to alternative venues if the primary timeline falters.

This comprehensive guide details the academic submission lifecycle for USENIX Security. It maps out the multi-stage review pipeline, from initial submission through early rejection to final notification. It critically updates authors on the current decision vocabulary (e.g., Shepherd Approval, retired major revisions), emphasizing mandatory review foci like ethics adequacy, threat-model realism, and openness posture for strategic planning.

This skill models the entire peer-review pipeline for Web Conferences (WWW), detailing the stages from abstract submission to final notification. It guides authors and reviewers on the implications of track-scoped double-blind review, emphasizing criteria such as Web-centricity, evidence scale, and ethical considerations required for acceptance.