Skill UI

A comprehensive project management skill designed for academic submissions in Recommender Systems (RecSys). It guides users through the entire research lifecycle, from initial venue fit and data freezing to abstract submission, full paper writing, anonymous repository management, rebuttal drafting, and final camera-ready preparation. It provides backward-planning time offsets and risk identification.

This guide outlines how to strategically frame a manuscript's contribution for journals like the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED). It emphasizes identifying a single, sharp, dynamic or quantitative advance (e.g., a new mechanism, method, or quantitative result) and presenting it as a 'delta' against the closest existing model. It provides a checklist and stress test to ensure the core finding is immediately grasped by the target readership.

This comprehensive guide helps authors structure the inferential backbone of economic papers for top journals. It provides detailed checklists for theoretical models (assumptions, regularity), empirical studies (causal design, identification), and computational methods (convergence, asymptotics), ensuring claims are robust and credible across different paper types.

A detailed guide for structuring the introduction and related work sections of manuscripts submitted to Review of Economic Dynamics (RED). It teaches authors how to accurately map their contribution within established quantitative modeling traditions (e.g., DSGE, HANK), explicitly identifying the quantitative gap and the marginal theoretical advance for a specialized readership.

This guide establishes the rigorous policy for submitting computational and empirical papers to academic journals. It mandates that authors provide sufficient data, source code, and detailed documentation (including execution order, random seeds, and OS used) to ensure that research findings can be fully reproduced by others, adhering to global standards like Option C.

This guide helps researchers test whether their economic research question aligns with the specialized scope of top-tier journals, particularly those focusing on dynamic and quantitative mechanisms (like RED). It provides a structured methodology, including fit tests and scoring dimensions (Dynamics, Model, Discipline, Audience), to ensure the core contribution is genuinely dynamic and methodologically rigorous.

This auxiliary skill helps researchers assess the suitability of their academic manuscripts in economics, social science, or management for submission to high-level journals like 'Reform of Economic System'. It provides comprehensive guidance on journal positioning, required theoretical depth, appropriate methodology, structural requirements, and common pitfalls, helping authors significantly improve their submission readiness and increase acceptance chances.

This skill guides authors in assessing whether their scholarly work—particularly those employing New Historicism or interdisciplinary cultural analysis—is suitable for highly specialized academic venues. It emphasizes the necessity of building arguments outward from concrete historical or material particulars (like archival fragments or objects), rather than relying on free-floating theory. Use this aid to re-frame and strengthen the material basis of your scholarly manuscript before submission.

A comprehensive skill designed to help users assess the suitability of their economics or management manuscript for 'Research on Financial and Economic Issues'. It provides detailed guidelines on journal positioning, submission requirements, thematic preferences, and common rejection pitfalls, ensuring authors align their work with the journal's scope and style.

This guide teaches authors how to properly position their research contribution within a specialized academic field, particularly for journals like Research Policy. It instructs users on how to move beyond simple citation lists by identifying a clear, theoretical knowledge gap (a tension) in the existing literature. By anchoring the work in foundational canons and naming the prevailing consensus, authors can structure a compelling argument that defines what the field should believe after reading the paper.

This guide assists in building a robust theoretical framework for research policy manuscripts. It moves beyond simple empirical measurement by structuring the argument using the innovation-mechanism chain (antecedent → mechanism → outcome). It teaches how to connect firm-level findings up to the systemic policy or institutional level, ensuring the contribution is theoretically advanced and legible across disciplines (e.g., economic, managerial, STS).

This guide helps researchers precisely define the marginal contribution (the 'delta') of their academic work. Instead of writing a general literature tour, it instructs authors to compare their findings directly against 3-5 most proximate prior papers, emphasizing specific advancements in identification or measurement. It is crucial for submissions to high-stakes journals.