Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for researchers on how to effectively position academic contributions, particularly for top-tier development economics journals. It instructs users to move beyond merely stating a research topic (e.g., 'first to study X in Y') by framing their findings as generalizable claims about underlying mechanisms or quantitative gaps. Key focus areas include linking academic gaps to active development policy debates and strategically distinguishing the work from similar fields like JDE or World Development.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for designing and auditing academic tables and figures, specifically for development economics journals. It teaches how to translate statistical coefficients into actionable policy magnitudes, validate research design (e.g., balance checks, pre-trends), and adhere to strict page limits while maintaining clarity for both economists and policymakers.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors writing for development economics journals, specifically addressing the need to bridge the gap between rigorous econometric analysis and actionable policy advice. It teaches how to structure introductions, write concise abstracts, and frame findings by emphasizing policy magnitudes over statistical significance, ensuring the work speaks to both technical economists and non-specialist policymakers.

webmcpify is a specialized pipeline designed to make existing web applications agent-ready. It extracts user-facing functionality and exposes it as WebMCP tools, allowing AI agents to interact with the application via structured, reliable tool calls rather than fragile DOM scraping. The tool guides developers through detection, inventory, integration, verification, and healing phases to ensure robust AI interoperability.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major or minor revisions following peer review at top-tier journals (e.g., World Development). It teaches how to structure the rebuttal letter, synthesize conflicting referee demands (methodology vs. context), and strategically triage feedback—conceding, strengthening, or defending—to maximize the chance of publication.

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for authors responding to a 'Revise and Resubmit' (R&R) decision from a top-tier journal. It details how to structure a concise, persuasive, and highly professional rebuttal memo (typically limited to five pages). Learn how to address every reviewer comment, reconcile conflicting demands, protect the paper's core arguments, and maintain scholarly rigor while remaining anonymous.

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for authors submitting to conferences like WSDM, which historically do not have a dedicated rebuttal phase. It teaches preemptive objection engineering, how to structure answers directly into the PDF, managing post-submission communication channels, and planning next steps whether accepted or rejected.

This guide teaches researchers how to strategically position a paper's contribution within established academic lineages (e.g., click models, LTR). It emphasizes moving beyond simple citation coverage to writing precise 'contrast sentences' that articulate the technical delta, ensuring the work's novelty is clearly defined relative to neighboring venues like SIGIR and KDD. Ideal for authors refining their technical writing for top-tier conferences.

This skill guides the construction of complex legal arguments, adhering to the standard persuasive arc: doctrine → theory → normative. It ensures the writing systematically moves from mapping existing law (the problem) to developing a conceptual framework (the why) and finally proposing actionable reforms (the fix). It is essential for building a rigorous, logical, and comprehensive academic argument.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for constructing academically rigorous legal citations, adhering strictly to The Bluebook format and specific journal requirements. It emphasizes the necessity of pinpoint citations, ensuring every law or fact assertion is supported by an authoritative source. Essential for law students, legal scholars, and researchers drafting highly accurate scholarly articles.

A comprehensive checklist for authors submitting to academic law journals, specifically tailored for The Yale Law Journal (YLJ). It guides users through critical pre-upload steps, including mandatory anonymization checks, adhering to strict length caps (Article, Essay, Forum), verifying Bluebook citation apparatus, and ensuring the use of the official submission portal. This tool helps prevent common submission failures before the final upload.

This workflow performs a comprehensive review against the Azure Well-Architected Framework (WAF) using your existing Infrastructure as Code (IaC) and deployed resources. It systematically checks the five pillars—Reliability, Security, Cost Optimization, Operational Excellence, and Performance Efficiency—identifying architectural risks, drift, and compliance gaps. Findings are automatically logged and converted into actionable GitHub issues for streamlined remediation.