Skill UI

This framework manages the ingestion, organization, synchronization, and search of knowledge across multiple storage layers, including local files, persistent memory, vector stores, and Git repositories. It provides a structured approach for ensuring knowledge durability, deduplication, and maintaining a 'single source of truth' across complex development and operational contexts.

A comprehensive skill implementing the GTD weekly review process. It guides users through three deterministic phases (Get Clear, Get Current, Get Creative) to audit open loops, check project commitments, and ensure the personal system remains trustworthy. It helps users close open loops, audit stalled projects, and maintain a reliable organizational workflow.

This advanced skill provides a rigorous framework for assessing whether an organizational or management research manuscript is suitable for highly selective, theory-driven journals like the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ). It guides authors on necessary theoretical framing, methodological rigor (e.g., endogeneity, causal inference), structural improvements, and common pitfalls to avoid, significantly improving submission quality and maximizing acceptance chances.

This tool guides authors to assess whether their management or organizational research manuscript is suitable for the Academy of Management Review (AMR). It focuses on the journal's pure-theory nature, providing detailed checks on conceptual novelty, logical rigor, structural requirements, and identifying potential desk-reject risks for non-empirical, theory-building papers.

This skill helps researchers determine if their accounting manuscript aligns with the scope, theoretical depth, and interpretive focus of Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS). It provides guidance on framing, methodology, and potential rejection risks, guiding authors toward critical, behavioral, or historical accounting research.

This skill provides a rigorous framework for assessing whether a scholarly manuscript meets the exceptionally high theoretical and conceptual standards of Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ). It guides authors on identifying the core theoretical contribution, evaluating the required research craft (qualitative or quantitative), and restructuring the paper to align with the sociology of organizations discourse, moving beyond mere empirical findings.

This guide teaches authors how to structure scientific manuscripts by correctly partitioning core findings, decisive evidence, and the main narrative into the body text, while moving exhaustive datasets, full protocols, and secondary characterization into the Supporting Information (SI). It ensures the main paper is stand-alone and convincing.

Designed for advanced academic reviews, this framework guides the development of a unifying 'spine' that transcends simple literature summaries. It forces the writer to impose a novel organizational logic—such as a typology, process model, or integrating construct—thereby achieving genuine theory advancement and defining the field's future research agenda. Use this when the draft reads like a disconnected list of papers.

This guide teaches researchers how to articulate the core conceptual contribution of their work, especially for manuscripts in Accounting, Organizations, and Society (AOS). It moves beyond simply reporting findings or extending literature, helping the user synthesize solid evidence into a single, compelling, and conceptually deep claim that shifts the field’s understanding of accounting's social or organizational mechanisms. It is essential for structuring the discussion section's intellectual payoff.

A comprehensive guide for conducting rigorous analysis for Accounting, Organizations, and Society (AOS) manuscripts. It covers both qualitative methods—such as coding, building evidence chains, and weighing counter-evidence—and quantitative techniques, including experimental, survey, and archival model estimation. The focus is on maintaining a fully reproducible audit trail and reconciling mixed-methods findings.

This guide instructs authors on how to precisely situate their manuscript within the established, interdisciplinary conversations of the Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) journal. It emphasizes the necessity of engaging the specific historical canon, citing core primary social-science theories, and critically defining the 'delta'—the precise conceptual advance—compared to 2-3 immediate prior works. This is a structural guide for advanced academic writing.

This guide provides comprehensive methodological blueprints for designing scholarly manuscripts submitted to Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS). It covers various research paradigms, including qualitative field studies, behavioral experiments, surveys, and historical/archival inquiries. Emphasis is placed on rigorous planning, ethical considerations (IRB approval, consent, anonymity), and maintaining theoretical alignment between the research design and the core argument, helping researchers avoid methodological pitfalls.