Skill UI

This guide helps polish academic manuscripts for submission to specialized journals, such as the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI). It ensures adherence to institutional house conventions (numbered sections, author-date referencing, concise abstract) and, critically, structures the argumentation to explain the underlying economic mechanism *before* presenting formal econometric specifications, elevating the paper's scholarly rigor.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors to articulate the unique and marginal contribution of their research within the highly specialized field of health economics. It teaches how to frame findings against canonical literature, identify specific gaps, and structure the argument to satisfy expert reviewers, ensuring the paper's novelty is clearly demonstrated.

This guide provides a structured framework for presenting complex empirical results in academic manuscripts, particularly for international marketing journals. It details the essential 'spine exhibits' (conceptual models, invariance tables, cross-national patterns) and teaches techniques like the 'claim test' and 'triage' to ensure arguments are clear, rigorous, and adhere to strict page limits.

This skill guides researchers in transforming raw empirical findings into robust, portable, field-level theoretical contributions suitable for top-tier journals. It provides a structured framework for elevating results by defining explicit communication mechanisms, establishing scope conditions, and articulating observable implications. It ensures the work contributes to the core body of theoretical communication knowledge, moving beyond simple effect documentation.

This guide helps researchers structure and refine academic papers for the Journal on Communications (JOC). It provides a framework for separating core, decision-making content (main text) from supporting details (appendices/supplementary material), ensuring the manuscript remains scientifically rigorous yet adheres to strict length constraints (e.g., ~12000 characters). It teaches how to use a 'decisive three-question' standard.

This guide provides expert strategies for positioning academic research, particularly in urban economics. It teaches how to precisely articulate a manuscript's marginal contribution against established theoretical frontiers (e.g., agglomeration, spatial equilibrium, housing supply) and related canonical literature, ensuring the paper is clearly differentiated and compelling to expert referees.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR), a high-impact journal for authoritative, continuously updated review articles in relativity and gravitation. It covers the journal's unique 'living' model, required evidence standards, scope definition, house style, and the long-term commitment required to create a definitive, pedagogical survey article.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting policy or management papers, detailing the required structure and depth for the institutional background section. It ensures the manuscript meets the high standards of major academic journals by providing a four-part framework, timeline requirements, and linking the policy context directly to the identification strategy.

A comprehensive guide for positioning high-impact scientific research for journals like Nature. It covers scope fit, methodological rigor, structural constraints, and techniques for framing complex findings into a universal, compelling narrative for a broad, non-specialist audience.

This guide outlines best practices for structuring supplementary materials for OOPSLA submissions. It emphasizes the 'layering decision,' ensuring the core body can stand alone while appendices provide necessary proofs and technical details. It covers maintaining double-anonymity across all included content and performing crucial cross-checks for consistency across multiple review rounds.

This guide helps scholars assess if their social, economic, or cultural history manuscript aligns with the rigorous, problem-driven standards of Past & Present. It instructs authors on framing their research around a core "big question"—a genuine historical problem—ensuring comparative significance, adhering to historiographical expectations, and meeting specific academic standards like double-blind review and Chicago style.

A guide for scholars on structuring academic essays to stake a clear, significant contribution within a broad critical conversation. It teaches how to move beyond simple citation dumps by identifying the core scholarly problem, engaging diverse critical traditions, and pre-empting counter-arguments, ensuring the work resonates with both specialists and generalists in the field.