Skill UI

Guides researchers through drafting publication-ready machine learning papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, and COLM by combining expert writing philosophy with LaTeX templates, citation verification APIs, and collaborative workflows.

Draft a LaTeX paper section by section from a paper plan and narrative report. Automatically applies venue-specific styles for ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, ACL, AAAI, ACM and IEEE formats, fetches real BibTeX from DBLP/CrossRef to avoid hallucinated citations, and runs reviewer-backed section reviews.

A 12-agent pipeline for writing academic papers across all disciplines. Supports 11 modes including full drafting, outlining, revision coaching, literature review, citation checks, AI disclosure, and conference rebuttal audits, with LaTeX, DOCX, and PDF output.

This meta-skill is designed for drafting and producing new academic or research papers and LaTeX manuscripts. It orchestrates a multi-step workflow, handling source search, citation planning, drafting, length checks, and final LaTeX/PDF compilation. It supports both compact outlines and full, publication-ready manuscripts.

This tool extracts and standardizes comprehensive paper-writing preferences from a user's initial request. It determines whether the generation should proceed directly using safe academic defaults or if it needs to initiate a preference interview, ensuring all structured data required for robust academic drafting is captured.

This skill generates highly structured legal documents, including memos, case summaries, and argument outlines. It utilizes the standard IRAC format (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) to provide comprehensive legal analysis. Ideal for drafting position papers, legal advice summaries, or preparatory documents for court submissions, ensuring all legal arguments are systematically presented and uncertainties are explicitly flagged.

A comprehensive guide for authors on drafting a strategic response during the OpenReview cycle. This resource covers how to address reviewer objections, shape the Area Chair's meta-review summary, manage the discussion phase, and decide whether to defend the paper or withdraw for a future revision cycle. Focus on clarity, conciseness, and evidence-based arguments.

This tool serves as the central entry point and orchestrator for drafting an American Political Science Review (APSR) manuscript. It guides authors through the complex academic publishing lifecycle by determining the paper's specific track (e.g., Regular Article, Synthesis, Registered Report) and its current developmental stage (e.g., Idea, Theory, Data Analysis). It does not draft content; rather, it routes the user to the most relevant sub-skill for the next step in the writing process.

This guide provides a tactical framework for drafting high-stakes author responses (rebuttals) to peer reviews in top-tier academic conferences. It details how to triage reviewer comments (factual errors, questions, disputes), structure the argument within strict word limits (e.g., 800 words), and maintain a professional, evidence-based tone to maximize the paper's chances of acceptance or major revision.

This guide provides comprehensive strategies for drafting and revising highly technical academic papers for top-tier conferences like ASPLOS. It focuses on structuring the core argument around cross-layer insights, ensuring claims are quantifiable and bounded, and optimizing the entire manuscript to survive rapid peer review and strict page limitations.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for drafting a rebuttal letter to an academic journal (such as ASQ) after a major revision request. It teaches the critical process of structuring a point-by-point response, gracefully addressing conflicting reviewer opinions, and articulating how the paper's theoretical contribution has deepened to satisfy high academic standards. The focus is on professional communication and scholarly argumentation.

This skill guides the refinement of academic manuscripts for submission to the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS). It ensures the prose is accessible to a broad, international political science audience, enforces Cambridge's Harvard author-date citation style, and strictly adheres to specified word caps (e.g., $\le 150$-word abstracts). Use this skill when drafting introductions, tightening arguments, or formatting the final submission to maximize clarity and professional impact.