Skill UI

This guide outlines the rigorous standards for writing top-tier distributed systems conference papers. It details the mandatory narrative arc—moving from an operational pain point to a named design principle—and emphasizes that every claim must be supported by precise, measured evidence (e.g., percentiles and specific workloads) rather than relying on superlatives or vague adjectives. It also provides guidance on structuring the argument, budgeting page space, and designing figures as core evidence.

A comprehensive guide detailing the strategic and technical requirements for submitting research papers to major conferences like OOPSLA. It covers critical steps such as selecting the correct submission round, adhering to strict formatting rules (e.g., page limits), proactively maintaining double-anonymity, properly filing Data-Availability Statements, and managing complex revision or concurrent submissions to maximize acceptance chances.

This guide details the rigorous, post-acceptance process for preparing a research paper for IEEE Xplore publication. It covers crucial technical steps beyond simple formatting, including complete de-anonymization, adhering to the IEEEtran template, finalizing metadata (ORCID, index terms), passing PDF eXpress compliance, securing eCopyright, and properly linking open data repositories with DOIs.

This guide provides strict guidelines for structuring supplementary material for PerCom conference papers. The core rule is that the main paper body (within the tight 9-page budget) must be self-contained, allowing a reviewer to make a decision without accessing the dataset or appendix. Learn how to properly partition evidence, manage page budgets, and adhere to double-blind review rules.

This comprehensive guide provides the final preflight checklist for submitting academic manuscripts to PMLA via ScholarOne. It covers crucial guidelines including maintaining anonymity (blind review), verifying MLA membership eligibility, adhering to strict word counts, applying the latest MLA style, and properly disclosing any AI-generated content before final submission.

This guide details the mandatory open science requirements for modern academic publishing, particularly in psychological sciences. It covers essential practices such as depositing open data and materials with DOIs, drafting a Research Transparency Statement, linking preregistrations, and properly handling exemptions. It ensures manuscripts meet the high standards of reproducibility and transparency required by top-tier journals.

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous, theory-specific peer review process for major academic journals. It explains the mechanics of masked peer review, the distinction between Theoretical Articles and Theoretical Notes, and anticipates the deep theoretical objections that reviewers—who are often rival model builders—will raise. Use this before submission or after receiving a decision letter to properly strategize revisions.

This skill guides researchers on how to assess the suitability of their manuscript for the journal Research on Economics and Management. It provides detailed information on the journal's scope, required theoretical depth, methodological rigor (e.g., internal validity, identification strategies), structural expectations, and common pitfalls to avoid, ensuring submissions are properly framed and targeted.

This guide teaches authors how to properly position their research contribution within a specialized academic field, particularly for journals like Research Policy. It instructs users on how to move beyond simple citation lists by identifying a clear, theoretical knowledge gap (a tension) in the existing literature. By anchoring the work in foundational canons and naming the prevailing consensus, authors can structure a compelling argument that defines what the field should believe after reading the paper.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to the RAND Journal of Economics (RJE). It details how to build a robust, reproducible replication package, focusing on creating a master script, pinning the computational environment, and properly documenting restricted datasets. It specifically addresses RJE's unique policy, which does not mandate formal data or code deposits, while ensuring academic rigor is maintained for reviewers.

This specialized skill guides users in assessing whether their Chinese R&D or innovation management manuscript is suitable for submission to the journal Science Research Management. It helps users understand the journal's specific scope, required structure, key evidence types, and common rejection pitfalls, ensuring the work is properly framed for academic publication.

This guide outlines the strict writing and formatting requirements for submitting scholarly manuscripts to a general social science audience. Key guidelines include adopting the Chicago Manual of Style (17th ed., author-date), maintaining an accessible, argument-first prose, and adhering to a stringent total word count cap that includes all references. It ensures academic submissions are professional, readable, and properly formatted for publication.