Skill UI

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to high-tier academic journals. It verifies workflow compliance (e.g., ScholarOne), double-anonymity, adherence to strict page limits, preparation of the transparency commitment, and proper formatting (APA 7th). This guide ensures authors are fully prepared for the rigorous academic submission process.

This guide provides a comprehensive project management workflow for academic submissions to the MobiSys conference. It outlines the critical path, from initial system design and on-device measurement to final paper submission and artifact preparation. The workflow helps users plan backward from the single, crucial December deadline, managing device experiment lead time and mitigating common academic failure modes.

Provides a comprehensive, detailed audit checklist for authors submitting papers intended for NAACL. This guide walks through the complex ACL Rolling Review (ARR) submission cycle, ensuring the manuscript passes all mandatory technical gates—such as anonymity checks, format compliance, structural requirements, and accurate declaration—before the final conference commitment. Essential for navigating the unique timeline and rigorous standards of top NLP conferences.

Provides a comprehensive guide for authors targeting The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). It outlines the journal's stringent editorial standards, including the required evidence bar, structured abstract formatting, and best practices for clinical manuscript submission, helping authors gauge manuscript fit and preparation needs.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the Organization Science submission and review process. Learn about the decentralized senior-editor model, conflict-of-interest routing, double-blind preparation, and how to interpret complex decision letters (accept, reject, R&R). This resource is essential for authors preparing high-quality manuscripts for this top-tier academic venue.

A comprehensive guide for researchers preparing system artifacts for major conferences like OSDI. It outlines best practices for structuring deliverables, ensuring permanent and resolvable archiving (e.g., using Zenodo/DOI), and maximizing reproducibility. The guide emphasizes meeting the current academic standard for verifiable and functional system submissions.

A comprehensive guide for project-managing the demanding lifecycle of submitting a top-tier systems conference paper (e.g., OSDI). Covers critical deadlines, from initial title registration and full submission to artifact preparation and final paper revisions. It provides strategies for navigating review outcomes, retargeting to other venues (SOSP, NSDI), and utilizing the silent window for continuous improvement.

This tool acts as a comprehensive router for academic manuscript preparation, guiding authors through the complex stages of publishing for high-impact journals like PNAS Nexus. It does not write content, but rather diagnoses the current bottleneck—whether it requires addressing open access rules, polishing the significance statement, refining figures, or structuring the rebuttal. It ensures authors follow the optimal, structured path from initial concept to final submission.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end annual workflow for submitting to an academic conference. This resource covers critical milestones, including abstract registration, full-paper submission, review notification, and camera-ready preparation. It emphasizes strategic planning—such as timing proof completion and deciding between paper tracks—to maximize the chances of successful publication.

This skill guides authors in assembling a comprehensive transparency package for academic submissions (especially meta-analyses). It ensures adherence to Open Science principles by detailing requirements for protocol preregistration (PROSPERO/OSF), depositing the coded database, codebook, and analysis scripts. It is essential for proving the full reproducibility of quantitative research findings.

This tool serves as an essential orchestrator for crafting and submitting research syntheses (such as meta-analyses and systematic reviews) for Psychological Bulletin. It guides users through the entire rigorous research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and literature searching (PRISMA) to data coding, meta-analysis, theoretical integration, and final manuscript preparation. It ensures that the project is correctly framed as a synthesis of existing work, not a primary study.

This comprehensive guide details the entire editorial review process for quantitative economics publications, covering stages from initial desk screening through to pre-acceptance reproducibility checks. It provides critical insights into expected timelines (4-5 months), desk-reject risks, the Econometrica transfer option, and mandatory data/code preparation requirements. It is designed to set clear professional expectations for authors throughout the academic publishing cycle.