Skill UI

A comprehensive pre-submission audit guide for ICSE conference papers. It covers mandatory deadlines, strict formatting rules (10-page limit, IEEE template), double-anonymous submission best practices, and adhering to open science policies. Use this checklist before final submission to prevent desk rejection and ensure quality.

This skill guides authors on positioning manuscripts for the IEEE RO-MAN conference. It helps assess suitability, reframes content from general CS styles, and structures the narrative around core human-robot communication, social behavior, and interaction design. Use it for strategic venue selection and improving submission quality for human-robot interaction research.

This guide helps authors determine if their communication systems manuscript is suitable for IEEE Transactions on Communications (TCOM). It outlines the criteria for a high-quality submission, emphasizing the necessity of quantitative performance analysis, analytical derivations, and robust simulation validation. It guides authors on reframing pure simulation results into deeply researched, publishable academic work.

This skill is designed to assess the suitability of international macroeconomics and finance manuscripts for the IMF Economic Review. It evaluates the paper's fit, theoretical rigor, evidence quality, and adherence to open-economy principles. It provides crucial pre-submission self-checks, potential desk-reject risks, and re-routing suggestions to guide authors toward the most appropriate academic venue.

This skill guides users in evaluating whether their economics, management, or policy manuscript is a suitable fit for the journal 'Inquiry into Economic Issues.' It analyzes the journal's specific focus (regional development, Southwest opening, policy exploration), checks formatting requirements, and identifies common academic pitfalls and potential submission risks for high-quality Chinese academic publishing.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors determining the fit of their empirical software engineering (SE) manuscript for the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). It helps authors rigorously check the study design, evidence bar, proper framing, and necessary re-framing required to transform a journal or arXiv-style paper into a high-quality conference submission suitable for ESEM reviewers. It focuses on measurement validity, experimental rigor, and evidence synthesis.

A comprehensive project management guide designed for managing high-stakes scientific conference submissions (e.g., INTERSPEECH). It maps the rigorous annual cycle, from initial drafting and submission deadlines to camera-ready production and final conference presentation. The guide outlines specific milestones, roles, risk patterns, and backward planning techniques to ensure timely and high-quality project completion.

A comprehensive guide for the final pre-submission quality check of academic manuscripts, particularly for double-blind review processes. It covers critical compliance points such as maintaining anonymity, adhering to strict word counts (including figures/tables), managing separate metadata (abstracts, acknowledgments), and ensuring proper third-person self-citation to avoid common rejection pitfalls.

A comprehensive guide detailing the specific conventions required for submitting high-quality, data-driven papers in computer architecture to top-tier conferences like ISCA. It covers structuring the core argument around a single insight, developing measured motivation sections, describing mechanisms with checkable precision, and calibrating quantitative claims with empirical data and instruments. Essential for academic research communication in hardware design.

A comprehensive guide detailing the stringent standards and best practices for creating high-quality scientific figures for chemistry journals, specifically following the guidelines of the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS). Covers everything from reaction schemes and mechanism diagrams to NMR/IR spectra, crystal structures, and creating impactful Table of Contents (TOC) graphics, ensuring clarity, consistency, and adherence to academic publishing conventions.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier chemistry journals like JACS. This skill helps authors pre-empt reviewer objections, select appropriate suggested and excluded experts, and rigorously stress-test the manuscript's scope, characterization, and mechanistic claims before formal submission. It transforms the writing process into a defensible, high-quality academic product.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers evaluate whether a clinical or health-services study is appropriate for publication in JAMA Internal Medicine. It details the journal's high bar for methodological rigor, including requirements for randomized trials (CONSORT), observational studies (STROBE), and systematic reviews (PRISMA). It covers everything from study design and statistical reporting to addressing potential desk-reject triggers, ensuring authors submit high-quality, impactful research.