Skill UI

This tool acts as a workflow router for submitting manuscripts to the China Economic Quarterly (CEQ). It guides researchers through the entire academic publishing process, from initial topic positioning and literature review to advanced econometrics, figure creation, and handling reviewer reports (R&R). It ensures the manuscript meets the high standards of international dialogue and robust identification required by top-tier Chinese academic journals.

This guide outlines best practices for packaging research artifacts (prototypes, datasets, instruments, code) for academic review and permanent public release, particularly in HCI venues like CHI. It covers strategies for creating highly reviewable, anonymous submissions (e.g., claims maps, minimal demos) and establishing robust, licensed, permanent archives (e.g., DOIs, OSF), ensuring research reproducibility and auditability.

This guide provides rigorous methodological standards for authors submitting economic papers to the China Economic Quarterly (CEQ). It emphasizes aligning research with international top-field standards, requiring clean causal identification, structural modeling, and advanced econometric techniques (e.g., modern DID, IV, RDD). Use this to strengthen your paper's technical rigor and ensure its contribution is methodologically sound for top-tier Chinese journals.

This guide provides comprehensive guidelines for formatting academic manuscripts, specifically for Critical Inquiry (CI) submissions. It strictly adheres to the Chicago Manual of Style (17th ed.), mandating the use of consecutively numbered footnotes and eliminating the need for a separate works-cited list. It also covers best practices for submitting high-resolution figures (300 ppi JPEG/TIFF) and managing citations to ensure they contribute effectively to the word count and scholarly argument.

This guide details the rigorous process of revising academic manuscripts for top-tier scholarly journals. It provides a structured strategy for authors to respond to editor and reviewer feedback, emphasizing strengthening the central intervention, addressing every comment point-by-point, and reconciling conflicting scholarly opinions while maintaining academic rigor.

This guide teaches writers how to move beyond a literature review to effectively position their argument within an ongoing academic 'conversation.' It outlines the structural map required: identifying the core intellectual debate, pinpointing the existing assumptions (standing view), defining the gap or contradiction (pressure point), and clearly stating the essay's unique contribution (move) and potential implications (payoff). Ideal for advanced academic writing, critical theory, and interdisciplinary research.

This comprehensive guide serves as the final pre-submission checklist for publishing in Critical Inquiry (CI). It details crucial, often overlooked requirements—such as adhering to strict word counts (including notes and bibliography), using Microsoft Word format, following Chicago 17th footnotes (no works-cited list), providing separate, high-resolution images, and confirming single-submission status. Using this checklist minimizes common publication errors before hitting 'submit' on Editorial Manager.

This guide helps academics determine if their manuscript aligns with the scope of China Industrial Economics, or if it should be redirected to more specialized journals (e.g., Economic Research, Management World). It provides criteria based on empirical rigor, policy quasi-experiments, and specific research focus (industry, enterprise, environment).

This guide outlines rigorous standards for conducting heterogeneity analysis in economic research. It stresses that heterogeneity should not merely involve slicing data by region or size, but must be theoretically driven, linking multiple dimensions (e.g., ownership, financing constraints, industry type) to core economic mechanisms. The analysis must demonstrate significant group differences and clearly connect findings to differential policy implications, elevating the discussion from mere observation to actionable policy science.

This guide provides rigorous standards for crafting academic literature reviews, particularly for specialized journals in economics. It instructs authors to move beyond simple citation listing and instead structure the review around identified research gaps. The required structure emphasizes a clear progression from 'Current Status' to 'Deficiencies' and finally to 'Novel Positioning,' ensuring the paper's marginal contribution is clearly derived from a knowledge gap.

This guide provides rigorous criteria for formulating policy implications in academic manuscripts, particularly in industrial economics. It enforces the transition from vague, conceptual suggestions to highly actionable recommendations. Key elements require identifying the specific *agent* (who), the *implementation node* (where), the *concrete action* (what), and the *direct evidence* derived from the paper's findings or heterogeneity. It helps authors structure arguments to ensure theory genuinely guides practice.

A comprehensive methodological guide for conducting exhaustive robustness checks in academic economics manuscripts, particularly for journals requiring high empirical rigor. It provides an exhaustive checklist covering variable replacement, sample window manipulation, advanced identification strategies (like PSM-DID and placebo tests), and crucially, systematically ruling out alternative explanations and confounding factors. Mastering this process is essential for defending research findings against rigorous peer review.