Skill UI

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the critical pre-submission steps for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). It ensures that the manuscript is structured as an accessible synthesis for a broad audience, adheres to mandatory AEA disclosure policies, and meets all formatting and submission requirements before emailing the proposal or paper.

A comprehensive guide for academics to determine if a research topic is suitable for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). It teaches authors to shift focus from presenting a narrow, new result (primary research) to synthesizing a broad, timely, and accessible understanding for a non-specialist audience, assessing criteria like breadth of interest, timeliness, and synthesizability.

This router guides authors through the entire process of developing a compelling, non-technical synthesis article for a broad audience, specifically for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). It determines the optimal next skill to use—whether focusing on topic selection, narrative structure, improving accessibility, ensuring balance, or drafting the initial proposal—ensuring the final product reads as an accessible essay rather than a specialized research paper.

This guide helps writers polish academic manuscripts to conform to the engaging, clear, and authoritative style of the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). Focuses on transforming dense, passive, jargon-heavy prose into plain-language narratives suitable for a broad, non-specialist academic audience. Ideal for refining abstracts, opening paragraphs, and improving overall voice structure.

This skill guides authors in assessing whether their economic research is suitable for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). JEP specializes in publishing accessible, non-technical, and synthetic articles aimed at a broad readership of economists. It helps authors shift their focus from complex empirical estimations to clear exposition, balanced synthesis, and general intellectual framing, providing a comprehensive pre-submission checklist.

This skill guide is designed for researchers and academics submitting manuscripts to specialized journals in economics and management. It helps users analyze a target journal's specific scope, required theoretical perspectives (e.g., institutional economics, political economy), and structural demands. It provides guidance on manuscript revision, identifying high-risk areas for rejection, and suggesting alternative suitable venues.

This guide provides comprehensive submission guidelines for the Journal of World Economy, focusing on open-economy macroeconomics, international trade, and global finance. It emphasizes aligning research with an international perspective, covering topics like FDI, trade regimes, and global value chains, ensuring submissions address the transmission channels of external shocks.

This comprehensive guide assists authors in determining if their authoritative clinical-oncology review or perspective fits the scope of Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. It details the required synthesis depth, scope, commissioned submission process, and warns against submitting primary research, ensuring authors adhere to the specialized guidelines for this prestigious journal.

A comprehensive guide for authors planning an authoritative review or perspective piece for Nature Reviews Physics. It outlines the journal's high standards, emphasizing synthesis, conceptual framing, and cross-disciplinary accessibility over primary research reporting. Use this skill to structure your argument, understand the required evidence bar, and prepare for the editorial commissioning process.

This comprehensive guide outlines the proactive editorial strategy for authors submitting a scholarly 'perspective' article. It teaches authors how to define and maintain the scope, anticipate critical referee questions (e.g., breadth, balance, framework), and strategically select objective reviewers to ensure the manuscript meets high academic standards.

A comprehensive guide for researchers preparing submissions to specialized academic journals, such as Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS). This guide details the strategic process of writing a proposal, differentiating between stand-alone, cooperative, and miscellaneous contributions. It teaches authors how to structure the core argument (the 'spine') and articulate the field's current need, ensuring submissions are timely, focused, and methodologically sound.

A comprehensive guide for revising scholarly 'Perspective' papers after receiving major or minor revisions from editors and reviewers. It provides a structured methodology for addressing common critiques, including coverage gaps, balance complaints, argument strengthening, and open science requirements. This skill helps authors draft a professional, point-by-point response letter and ensures the revised manuscript meets rigorous academic standards.