Skill UI

Automates the scheduling of core content across major social media platforms, including Instagram, LinkedIn, X, TikTok, and YouTube. This tool generates platform-optimized variations, adhering to specific character limits, aspect ratios, and brand guidelines. It also integrates advanced features like UTM tracking, optimal posting time recommendations, and engagement monitoring setup, ensuring consistent and high-impact brand presence across all channels.

This guide provides a strategic framework for drafting highly effective and concise author rebuttals for major AI conferences like AAAI. Given strict character limits, no URLs, and no new results, it teaches authors how to triage reviewer feedback, focus on decision-critical factual errors, and maximize impact to improve paper acceptance chances.

A comprehensive audit guide for the final pre-upload stage of major academic conference submissions (e.g., ASPLOS). This tool ensures compliance across critical areas, including strict 11-page limits, mandatory LaTeX templates, correct full-name citation formatting, hyperlinked DOIs, double-blind anonymity, and accurate HotCRP form completion.

This guide provides comprehensive strategies for drafting and revising highly technical academic papers for top-tier conferences like ASPLOS. It focuses on structuring the core argument around cross-layer insights, ensuring claims are quantifiable and bounded, and optimizing the entire manuscript to survive rapid peer review and strict page limitations.

A comprehensive checklist detailing all mandatory requirements for submitting academic manuscripts (e.g., Contemporary Accounting Research). It verifies compliance on key areas including length limits, abstract word count, separated title pages, blind manuscripts, ethics approval (IRB/REB), data integrity statements, and correct payment proof. Use this before the final upload to ensure maximum readiness and avoid editorial rejection.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting scientific papers to major conferences. It details the strategic placement of supplementary material across the main body, in-PDF appendices, and external anonymous artifacts. Learn how to maximize impact and provide necessary evidence while strictly adhering to page limits and respecting reviewer attention economics.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for revising Communication Research (CR) manuscripts following a revise-and-resubmit (R&R). It addresses the core challenge of satisfying two independent, often skeptical, expert reviewers simultaneously—specifically concerning measurement validity, tested mechanisms, and confound control—all while adhering to strict page limits. It focuses on strategic revision planning, managing the page budget, and structuring the response memo.

A methodology for refining conservation biology manuscripts, ensuring scientific findings have direct, actionable implications for biodiversity conservation. It guides authors on bridging evidence to practical management, policy recommendations, and restoration strategies, while rigorously maintaining scientific proportionality and acknowledging limitations.

This guide outlines the strategic allocation of content—such as results, methods, and limitations—into the main body, appendix, or artifact for academic submissions. The core principle is 'decision-criticality': any information a reviewer must read to accept the paper must reside in the main body, ensuring key findings are not hidden in supplementary materials or repositories.

This comprehensive style guide is written for authors submitting research papers to the CoRL conference. It provides specific directives on structuring the narrative to satisfy two distinct audiences: machine learning theorists and robotics engineers. It emphasizes quantifying all claims with concrete evidence scales (e.g., success rates, frequency), structuring the argument within a limited page count, and properly integrating mandatory sections like Limitations.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a single-page academic rebuttal after conference reviews (e.g., CVPR). It teaches authors how to strategically address multiple reviews, correct factual errors, and clarify scope within strict formatting and content limitations, focusing on the Area Chair's perspective and emphasizing data over adjectives.

A comprehensive guide on how to structure and write a high-impact academic rebuttal for top-tier conferences like ECCV. It advises authors on strategic space management, prioritizing the rebuttal of misreadings, conceding limitations gracefully, and preparing arguments specifically for the Area Chair (AC) discussion, ensuring the limited page count is used efficiently.