Skill UI

This plugin integrates the OpenViking context database, providing powerful long-term memory, session archiving, and semantic recall for OpenClaw agents. It enables agents to query, debug, and manage persistent knowledge bases, significantly enhancing conversational depth and complex tool usage.

This comprehensive skill acts as a specialized editor and submission guide for academic journals focused on organizational studies. It helps researchers assess the theoretical fit of their manuscripts against the rigorous standards of organizational theory, strategic management, and organizational behavior. It guides users on identifying theory gaps, structuring arguments, and avoiding common rejection pitfalls.

This tool guides the accurate invocation of the `ov skills` command group for managing the entire skill lifecycle on OpenViking. It supports adding skills from local directories, Git repositories, or GitHub URLs, and provides commands for listing, searching, updating, removing, and validating skill formats. Use it when an agent needs to automate skill deployment or discover available capabilities.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors to determine if their research manuscript fits the scope of Production and Operations Management (POM) and which specific department or journal is the best target. It outlines critical criteria, such as identifying a real operational decision, passing the practice-relevance gate, and strategically selecting a single department for submission, helping authors avoid common submission pitfalls.

This skill helps authors determine the suitability of their research paper (analytical, empirical, or behavioral) for prestigious Operations Management journals like Production and Operations Management (POM). It provides detailed guidance on required scope, methodological rigor (e.g., identification strategies, model assumptions), structural requirements, and common pitfalls to ensure maximum publication potential.

This skill guides researchers on how to assess the suitability of their manuscript for the journal Research on Economics and Management. It provides detailed information on the journal's scope, required theoretical depth, methodological rigor (e.g., internal validity, identification strategies), structural expectations, and common pitfalls to avoid, ensuring submissions are properly framed and targeted.

This comprehensive guide provides methodological frameworks for designing rigorous empirical studies in strategic management. It covers defining the sample, selecting the unit of analysis, validating key measures (performance and strategic choices), and critically, implementing robust identification designs (e.g., DID, IV, Fixed Effects) to address endogeneity and establish causal claims.

This comprehensive guide walks authors through the rigorous academic review process, specifically referencing the Strategic Management Journal (SMJ). It teaches how to correctly interpret complex decision letters (e.g., Major Revision, Desk Reject), understand the roles of action editors and reviewers, and systematically identify critical concerns (such as contribution to theory or endogeneity). Use this skill when you need to structure a detailed revision plan and write a convincing rebuttal letter to a top-tier academic journal.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final pre-submission process for manuscripts targeting the Strategic Management Journal (SMJ). It covers critical steps such as implementing double-blind anonymization, structuring the mandatory dual abstracts (research and managerial), verifying APA formatting, and ensuring all required files (cover letter, supplements) are prepared before submission.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers determine if their academic research question aligns with the scope and criteria of top-tier strategic management journals (e.g., SMJ). It provides a multi-part fit test covering strategic DNA, unit of analysis (firm-level), theoretical stakes, and empirical identification challenges. It guides authors on sharpening their questions and choosing the correct specialized journal (SMJ, SEJ, GSJ).

This comprehensive tool assesses the suitability of a manuscript for the Strategic Management Journal (SMJ). It guides authors through critical self-checks, focusing on the necessity of a clear contribution to strategy theory, the required level of empirical rigor (e.g., handling endogeneity), and ensuring the core focus remains on firm-level strategic decisions and performance outcomes. Essential for pre-submission refinement.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting policy or management papers, detailing the required structure and depth for the institutional background section. It ensures the manuscript meets the high standards of major academic journals by providing a four-part framework, timeline requirements, and linking the policy context directly to the identification strategy.