Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing the single, short, double-blind rebuttal (Author Response) required during major AI conference review cycles (e.g., IJCAI-ECAI). It teaches authors how to precisely correct factual misreadings, supply missing evidence, and structure their arguments effectively within strict length limits, focusing only on verifiable facts rather than new claims or philosophical arguments.

A comprehensive audit guide for authors preparing submissions for the ECAI conference. It details critical steps including selecting the correct submission regime (standalone vs. joint), managing page budgets (7-page body limit), ensuring double-blind anonymity, and adhering to strict deadlines for abstract and full paper submissions. Essential reading before uploading to the conference portal.

A comprehensive guide on how to structure and write a high-impact academic rebuttal for top-tier conferences like ECCV. It advises authors on strategic space management, prioritizing the rebuttal of misreadings, conceding limitations gracefully, and preparing arguments specifically for the Area Chair (AC) discussion, ensuring the limited page count is used efficiently.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors preparing tables and figures for high-impact economics journals. The core principle is ensuring that every exhibit is self-contained, legible, and communicates the economic magnitude and meaning to a generalist audience, even without reading the surrounding text. It covers best practices for reporting elasticities, confidence bands, and structuring arguments.

This guide provides strategic advice on drafting author responses for major NLP conferences (like EMNLP/ACL ARR). It teaches authors how to triage reviewer comments by soundness, excitement, and misreading, structure replies for maximum impact on the Area Chair's meta-review, and manage conflicts between reviewers. Learn what evidence can be added mid-review and how to strategically concede.

This comprehensive guide details the critical steps for converting an accepted EuroSys paper into the final ACM proceedings format. It covers complex template changes, mandatory metadata completion (eRights, ORCID), artifact linking, and ensuring absolute coherence between the final PDF and the ACM Digital Library record. Essential reading for authors preparing for final submission compliance.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to FAccT, detailing the process of responding to academic reviews. It distinguishes between the short factual rebuttal (Turn 1) and the structured Revise-and-resubmit response (Turn 2). The guide emphasizes maintaining strict anonymity, correcting misreadings, and using a structured 'change ledger' to address every prioritized concern.

A comprehensive guide for crafting academic rebuttals in response to peer reviews (e.g., ICALP). It teaches authors how to strategically address correctness doubts, correct factual misreadings, provide necessary clarifications, and honestly concede genuine gaps, all while adhering to strict double-blind rules and limited word counts. The focus is strictly on technical precision, helping authors improve their paper's acceptance chances.

This comprehensive guide details the stringent process of preparing an accepted scholarly paper for publication in LIPIcs proceedings. It covers mandatory steps including converting to the specific `lipics-v2021` class, systematic de-anonymization (restoring authors, ORCIDs, and acknowledgements), completing rich metadata (ACM CCS, keywords, funding), and reconciling the final body text with the public full version. Essential reading for ensuring smooth production.

This comprehensive guide serves as an audit checklist for authors preparing submissions for ICALP (EATCS International Colloquium). It covers crucial academic submission logistics, including selecting the correct track (A or B), understanding the two-step deadline process (abstract registration and full submission), adhering to the 15-page body limit, and executing lightweight double-blind anonymity checks to prevent identifying metadata leaks. Essential reading before final upload.

A comprehensive guide for designing and reporting rigorous experimental results in robotics research. It details the 'evidence ladder' (from simulation to real-world deployment), statistical best practices (e.g., sample size, confidence intervals), ensuring baseline fairness, and quantifying sim-to-real transfer gaps. Essential reading for researchers submitting to top-tier robotics conferences.

A comprehensive, final-gate audit guide for submitting papers to major robotics conferences like ICRA using the PaperPlaza system. It details mandatory technical specifications, including page limits (6 content + 2 refs), IEEE two-column compliance, double-anonymous rules, video attachment specs, and critical deadlines. Essential reading to prevent submission rejection or administrative disqualification.