Skill UI

This guide details the rigorous academic review process for ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing (SoCC) submissions. It explains the dual-anonymous, two-round review structure, the importance of incorporating both systems performance and data measurement rigor (including tail latency and cost), and how the rebuttal period functions. Essential reading for authors aiming to publish in top-tier cloud computing venues.

A comprehensive guide to structuring and drafting rebuttal responses for top-tier academic conferences like SODA. This process teaches authors how to efficiently address referee concerns within a strict time limit, distinguishing between genuine flaws and simple misreadings. It emphasizes evidence anchoring, maintaining anonymity, and adhering to strict submission rules to maximize impact during the short response window.

This guide teaches authors how to structure and write a concise, evidence-based response during the academic rebuttal window (e.g., TACAS). It focuses on correcting factual misreadings, proving algorithm soundness, addressing evaluation fairness, and providing verifiable evidence, rather than rewriting the paper. It emphasizes brevity and targeted argumentation.

A comprehensive audit guide for the final pre-upload submission of UIST (User Interface Software and Technology) conference papers. This document details critical steps, including adhering to strict formatting rules (e.g., two-column layout, page limits), managing the abstract and paper deadlines, and executing thorough anonymity sweeps to prevent desk rejection. Essential reading for authors preparing for major academic conferences.

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous, journal-style review process for IEEE VIS full-paper submissions. It explains the two-phase evaluation structure, the significance of a 'Conditional Accept' (treating it like a major R&R), and how the process differs fundamentally from single-decision conference models (e.g., CVPR, CHI). Essential reading for authors navigating academic publication.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting visualization papers to major conferences like IEEE VIS. It outlines the strict rules for partitioning content, ensuring the core argument remains judgeable from the main body while leveraging supplemental materials (video, code, full data) to demonstrate interaction and reproducibility. Essential reading for academic researchers in the field.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting research papers to major Web Conferences (WWW). It details critical, irreversible steps such as author list freezing, restrictive page arithmetic (12 pages total), track selection protocols, anonymity checks, and managing submission caps. Essential reading for research teams preparing for demanding academic deadlines.

A comprehensive audit guide for authors submitting papers to the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). This guide details the critical requirements, including the single-column 11-point format, the double-blind anonymity rules, the importance of the abstract, table of contents, and the first twelve pages (the 'reading contract'). It covers formatting, publication policies, and the submission workflow to maximize review impact.

This skill implements an advanced reference pattern for integrating with Monitoring Control Platform (MCP) servers. It ensures accurate data retrieval by first reading a domain-specific 'gotchas' reference file, mitigating query failures caused by complex server behaviors, pagination limits, or subtle API quirks. It analyzes issue data, groups errors by root cause, and generates a structured, actionable markdown report for improved system health visibility.

A powerful, dependency-free CLI tool designed for programmatically creating, reading, analyzing, and modifying Microsoft Office files (.docx, .xlsx, .pptx). It supports deep DOM editing (L2) and raw XML manipulation (L3), allowing users to extract structured data, validate schemas, and perform complex document automation tasks from a single binary.

This protocol provides a systematic, multi-step diagnostic approach to determine if a command failure (e.g., permission denied, network issues) is genuinely due to sandbox restrictions or is caused by environmental or measurement errors. It includes eight critical checks—such as verifying shell scope and reading real exit codes—to eliminate false positives before filing a blocker report.