Skill UI

A guide for creating high-impact academic exhibits for literature reviews (e.g., Annual Reviews of Economics). It teaches how to synthesize findings into structured formats, including 'Who-found-what' summary tables, conceptual framework diagrams, and meta-evidence plots. The focus is on synthesizing existing knowledge across studies, not presenting original estimates. Essential for communicating complex, cross-field research findings to non-specialists.

A comprehensive guide designed to assess whether a research topic meets the high standards required for an Annual Review of Economics (ARE) article. It requires the field to demonstrate maturity, broad academic importance, and a clear need for an accessible synthesis, guiding the user to frame the work around an animating question rather than just a topic label.

This guide serves as a specialized workflow router for authors writing invited review articles for the Annual Review of Economics (ARE). It maps the entire lifecycle, from initial topic selection and proposal framing to systematic literature synthesis, framework imposition, evidence appraisal, and final revision, ensuring the resulting article is authoritative and comprehensive.

This skill guides art historians on gathering, weighing, and citing non-visual, documentary, and material evidence for academic articles. It covers citing primary sources (archives, contracts), reconstructing provenance chains, interpreting technical reports, and ensuring that all scholarly claims are rigorously traceable to verifiable sources rather than mere assertion.

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for authors responding to a British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) revise-and-resubmit decision. It details how to structure the response letter, address conflicting referee demands, reconcile disagreements, and strategically defend the paper's core contribution to convince the editor that the revision is cohesive and highly publishable.

This guide details the rigorous process of revising academic manuscripts for top-tier scholarly journals. It provides a structured strategy for authors to respond to editor and reviewer feedback, emphasizing strengthening the central intervention, addressing every comment point-by-point, and reconciling conflicting scholarly opinions while maintaining academic rigor.

This skill reconstructs the full narrative behind a piece of code by analyzing local Git history. Instead of just naming the last author (like git blame), it traces the file's origin, tracks subsequent changes, identifies related companion files, and extracts intent clues from commit messages. Use this when you need to know *why* code exists before refactoring, making risky edits, or understanding complex system behavior.

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for writing a persuasive revision and rebuttal letter, specifically tailored for high-impact journals in conservation science. It teaches authors how to structure responses to complex reviewer critiques, reconcile conflicting demands, and ensure the core conservation message is maintained while upholding scientific rigor.

Detailed guidance for authors submitting to top-tier academic journals (especially in Criminology) that require a Revise-and-Resubmit (R&R). This guide teaches authors how to structure a professional response letter, reconcile conflicting interdisciplinary reviewer demands, and strategically defend the paper's core theoretical contribution while ensuring scientific rigor and reproducibility.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major journal revisions (R&R), particularly in demography. It outlines strategies for addressing expert reviewer critiques, reconciling conflicting methodological assumptions (like rates or identification), and defending the core demographic substance using rigorous evidence. This skill ensures the response is structured, respectful, and scientifically robust.

This guide helps authors move beyond generic 'gap-spotting' when submitting to Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP). It teaches how to precisely define the scholarly contribution by naming a specific academic conversation and adopting a clear move (Extend, Qualify, Reconcile, Overturn). It also provides strategies to defend the manuscript's unique scope against competing journals like JBV, SEJ, and AMJ.

A comprehensive methodology for designing scientific and reproducible storage evaluations, particularly for high-stakes submissions. This guide covers controlling device state (aging, preconditioning, TRIM), selecting credible workloads (fio, YCSB), matching metrics (P99.9 latency, bytes-written) to claims, and rigorously testing durability and crash consistency on real hardware.