Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for drafting responses to reviewers during the Revise & Resubmit (R&R) phase. It teaches authors how to transform developmental, theory-level critiques into a credible, point-by-point reply and improved manuscript. Focus is placed on maintaining a respectful, collaborative tone and demonstrating deep theoretical engagement.

A comprehensive guide for authors on navigating the two distinct response phases of academic conferences (e.g., PODS). It details how to write a concise, double-anonymous rebuttal (48-hour turn) and a structured revision cover letter, ensuring all technical gaps are addressed while maintaining anonymity and professional rigor.

Provides detailed strategies for authors responding to peer reviews in top-tier academic conferences like SIGMOD. It covers the distinct rules for the mid-round feedback phase and the formal revision letter, emphasizing structured responses, mandatory change highlighting, maintaining anonymity, and strategic content budgeting.

This skill provides comprehensive guidelines for submitting clinical neurology and neuroscience research to The Lancet Neurology. It assesses the journal's scope (e.g., Phase III trials, global burden), the necessary evidence bar (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA compliance), and the required structure (structured abstract, 'Added value' panel). Use this tool to re-frame and optimize your manuscript to meet high-impact academic publication standards.

This comprehensive skill acts as a venue-selection and re-framing tool for authors targeting The Lancet Oncology. It provides deep insight into the journal's specific requirements, including methodological rigor (CONSORT, PRISMA), required evidence strength (Phase III RCTs, definitive biomarkers), structural elements (structured abstract, 'Added value' panel), and current submission best practices. Use this guide to assess if your clinical oncology manuscript is sufficiently advanced and impactful for this prestigious global journal.

A comprehensive guide detailing the mandatory and optional evaluation phases for academic security artifacts, such as those required for USENIX Security. It covers Phase-1 (availability) checks and Phase-2 (functionality, reproducibility) requirements. Provides best practices for structuring code, managing technical hazards (e.g., dangerous-by-default behavior), and ensuring verifiable, reproducible results for peer review.

webmcpify is a specialized pipeline designed to make existing web applications agent-ready. It extracts user-facing functionality and exposes it as WebMCP tools, allowing AI agents to interact with the application via structured, reliable tool calls rather than fragile DOM scraping. The tool guides developers through detection, inventory, integration, verification, and healing phases to ensure robust AI interoperability.

This robust pipeline guides development teams through a rigorous, five-phase planning process *before* writing any code. It systematically analyzes PRDs, design specifications (UX, accessibility), and existing architecture to produce a comprehensive implementation plan. Key outputs include Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), detailed task breakdowns, and verification strategies, ensuring all technical and design decisions are documented and scoped.

This tool simulates a senior application security engineer, performing a comprehensive, multi-phase audit. It checks for exposed secrets, prompt injection vectors, dependency vulnerabilities (supporting multiple languages), and critical configuration misconfigurations. It provides a scored, prioritized remediation report, ensuring a robust security posture before deployment.

This skill manages the human-in-the-loop verification phase of an agent workflow. It ensures that critical artifacts—such as plans, specifications, or migrations—receive mandatory, structured human sign-off before being considered complete or shipped. It collects severity-graded, machine-parseable feedback (e.g., BLOCKER, MAJOR) and acts as a strict gate, preventing completion until all objections are resolved and the review is formally signed off.

A comprehensive framework for developing a sustainable LinkedIn presence. It guides users through three critical phases: defining a robust positioning brief (pillars and exclusions), establishing a realistic posting cadence priced against a 'bad week,' and determining newsletter viability with a long-term commitment. Essential for career changers, consultants, or thought leaders seeking structured growth.

This skill automates the process of organizing unstructured client data—including emails, meeting notes, and org charts—into a structured, coherent matter brief. It supports the entire legal process lifecycle, from initial client intake and scoping to mid-matter reconstruction. Use it to compile raw material into a proposal-ready document, eliminating the painful, time-consuming phase of manual data assembly.