Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major or minor revisions following peer review. It details how to systematically triage reviewer reports, plan rigorous new in vivo or human experiments, structure point-by-point rebuttal letters, and maintain scientific rigor while narrowing claims. Designed for biomedical research and academic publishing.

A comprehensive guide to meeting the rigorous reporting standards required for high-impact scientific journals (e.g., Cell Press). It details the structure of STAR Methods, mandates the creation of a Key Resources Table (KRT), and outlines necessary authentication for cell lines, antibodies, animal models, and deposited data (including specific identifiers like RRIDs, GEO/PRIDE accessions). This ensures maximum transparency and reproducibility in scientific research writing.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for statistical analysis and reporting in biological manuscripts, particularly in cancer research. It teaches researchers how to correctly define 'n' (distinguishing biological from technical replicates), select appropriate statistical tests (ANOVA, survival analysis, etc.), and manage multiple comparisons, ensuring high scientific rigor and reproducibility in published data.

A comprehensive guide for designing, auditing, and reporting security experiments for top-tier conferences like ACM CCS. It emphasizes moving beyond simple benchmarks by mapping every security claim to undeniable evidence, including exploit runs on named targets, overhead measurements, and evaluation against adaptive attackers. Used for rigorous academic research defense.

This guide outlines the standardized requirements for declaring data and code availability in major scientific publications. It details mandatory best practices, including depositing raw data (e.g., sequencing, structures) and analysis code into approved, citable public repositories (such as GEO, PDB, Mendeley Data, and Zenodo). It also provides the required standardized three-bullet statement format for ensuring reproducibility.

This skill provides a comprehensive pre-submission review for manuscripts targeting Cell Reports Medicine. It assesses the manuscript's fit regarding scope (translational and clinical research with mechanistic depth), evidence bar (requiring strong validation and causality), and house style. It helps authors determine if their work aligns with the journal's requirements before official submission.

Outlines the mandatory and highly structured STAR Methods reporting format required by top-tier scientific journals. This guide details the five critical sections: Key Resources Table (KRT), Resource Availability, Experimental Model Details, Method Details, and Quantification & Statistical Analysis (QSA). Adherence to this structure ensures transparent, reproducible, and accessible scientific reporting.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine if their research on cementitious materials—covering hydration, microstructure, and durability—is sufficiently mechanistic for top-tier journals. It emphasizes shifting the narrative from simple mix-design performance reporting to establishing fundamental chemical, microstructural, or degradation mechanisms, supported by rigorous, quantitative characterization.

A detailed guide for scrutinizing statistical inference in high-level econometric manuscripts, designed to withstand rigorous technical peer review. It covers critical areas such as selecting appropriate clustering levels, handling weak instrumental variables (IV), correcting for multiple hypothesis testing, and ensuring accurate standard error reporting for panel data and causal inference models.

This tool acts as a workflow router for submitting manuscripts to the China Economic Quarterly (CEQ). It guides researchers through the entire academic publishing process, from initial topic positioning and literature review to advanced econometrics, figure creation, and handling reviewer reports (R&R). It ensures the manuscript meets the high standards of international dialogue and robust identification required by top-tier Chinese academic journals.

This comprehensive guide instructs authors on the entire process of responding to reviewer reports (R&R) for academic journals. It details the mandatory structure, tone, and strategic approaches for writing a detailed, point-by-point rebuttal letter, ensuring compliance with double-blind review rules and maintaining academic rigor.

This tool simulates the rigorous editorial process required for high-level journals in finance and economics. It guides authors to transform vague, policy-report-like drafts into precise, academically robust manuscripts. Key functions include eliminating empty-significance phrases, replacing generalizations with causal mechanisms, standardizing tense and person, structuring paragraphs with clear thesis statements, and ensuring all claims are supported by specific evidence and economic interpretation.