Skill UI

This skill bridges theoretical econometric designs (DiD, IV, RDD, SCM, DML) to concrete, audited statistical estimates. It orchestrates the necessary tool calls to fit models, generate comprehensive diagnostics, and report reliable findings, ensuring that every academic claim is backed by executable, traceable code. Essential for advanced causal inference research.

A comprehensive guide for designing and auditing high-stakes networking experiments, particularly for top-tier academic submissions like SIGCOMM. It outlines the 'evidence ladder' from microbenchmarks to live deployment, emphasizing the need to select robust baselines, report full performance distributions (percentiles and variance), and accurately map the mechanism's operational break points.

A comprehensive guide for packaging and submitting artifacts for Information Retrieval (IR) conferences (like SIGIR). It details the strict requirements for reproducibility, including mandatory components like TREC-format run files, qrels, and index recipes. The process covers repository structure, anonymization for review, handling data provenance, and ensuring that results can be audited by any reviewer using standard community tooling.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous methodology for designing, executing, and reporting experimental results in Information Retrieval (IR). It covers best practices for selecting appropriate test collections, choosing defensible metrics, performing proper statistical significance testing (e.g., paired t-tests), ensuring baseline fairness, and proactively addressing modern pitfalls like LLM contamination. Essential for publishing high-quality, auditable research in IR/NLP.

This comprehensive guide outlines best practices for designing and auditing empirical evaluations of formal verification tools and algorithms. It stresses the use of shared, community-accepted benchmarks, ensuring fair comparison against the strongest baselines with equal resources, meticulous reporting of all metrics, validating results for soundness, and guaranteeing full reproducibility on clean virtual environments.

A comprehensive guide for designing, auditing, and reporting advanced statistical and causal inference experiments. It emphasizes moving beyond simple accuracy metrics to quantify uncertainty, model robustness, and causal mechanisms. Covers metrics like coverage, KL divergence, and regret, and outlines best practices for seeding, compute fairness, and creating standardized reporting blocks (e.g., UAI standards).

This comprehensive guide provides researchers with structured methodologies for designing and auditing Computer Vision (CV) experiments for major conferences like WACV. It details the critical differences between the Applications and Algorithms tracks, emphasizing the need to report performance under real deployment constraints (e.g., power, latency) and ensuring fair, rigorous comparisons with baselines. Ideal for revising submissions to meet high review standards.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for designing rigorous and defensible evaluation sections for machine learning and information retrieval papers, particularly for top-tier conferences like WSDM. It covers the four critical evidence quadrants—Effectiveness, Validity, Efficiency, and Robustness—and details necessary protocols, such as temporal splits, proper baseline selection (including heuristics), ablation studies, and hardware-aware performance reporting. Use this when auditing or writing the experimental section of a research paper.

This tool audits all existing skills within the current project. It performs a comprehensive quality check, validating frontmatter completeness, tool scoping, and content quality against established standards. It produces a detailed, scored report, including effort-level recommendations for each skill. Ideal for new project onboarding, pre-release quality assurance, or diagnosing skill triggering issues.

This command inspects the native code execution sandbox environment. It reports on platform compatibility (e.g., bubblewrap, Seatbelt), active security configurations (auto-allow status, filesystem policies, network allowlists), and details recent security violations. Use it to audit the execution environment before running autonomous workflows.

This tool simulates a senior application security engineer, performing a comprehensive, multi-phase audit. It checks for exposed secrets, prompt injection vectors, dependency vulnerabilities (supporting multiple languages), and critical configuration misconfigurations. It provides a scored, prioritized remediation report, ensuring a robust security posture before deployment.

Turn interpretive-ambiguity audits of legal texts into polished deliverables: multi-page websites, single-page interactive sites, Word documents, PowerPoint decks, or LaTeX/PDF. Handles structured stress-test output, semi-structured reports, or raw prose, and renders consistent scenario-based legal analysis presentations.