Skill UI

This guide details the rigorous process of preparing research artifacts for formal evaluation at major academic conferences like ICSE. It covers achieving ACM badges (Available, Reusable, Reproduced/Replicated) by ensuring proper DOI archiving, open licensing, robust documentation, and verifiable reproducibility for external reviewers, transforming raw research into publishable, trustworthy assets.

A comprehensive guide modeling the specific, single-round, double-anonymous review pipeline for IEEE ICSME submissions. It details the crucial early-decision cut (Accept, Reject, Response Recommended) and emphasizes that unlike journal submissions, there are no Major Revision rounds. Use this to strategically plan your research submission and response artifact.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors seeking to submit manuscripts to the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). It helps evaluate the fit of research in signal processing, speech, audio, and image processing. It guides the framing, required empirical evidence (mathematical models, reproducible validation), and optimal positioning of the paper to maximize acceptance chances.

This guide details the comprehensive process for preparing security research artifacts for post-acceptance evaluation at major conferences like IEEE S&P. It covers the three types of evaluation badges (Available, Functional, Results Reproduced), strict handling constraints for exploits and malware, and best practices for packaging the submission (e.g., Dockerfiles, README structure) to ensure external evaluators can reliably reproduce findings within a limited time frame.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complex submission process for IEEE S&P, which operates across multiple self-contained cycles. This workflow map covers critical milestones like abstract registration, full paper submission, ethical review latency (IRB/disclosure), and planning for all three academic outcomes: Accept, Revise, or Reject. Essential for researchers managing multi-stage academic publishing timelines.

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors preparing their accepted research papers for final publication (camera-ready). This process involves de-anonymization, restoring full author details, updating copyright and metadata, ensuring formal formatting, and managing the release of promised artifacts and code for reproducibility.

This comprehensive guide outlines the rigorous, mandatory steps required to transform an accepted academic draft into a final, camera-ready version for conference proceedings. It covers critical areas like complete de-anonymization, permanent archiving of datasets and code using DOIs, finalizing ethical statements (IRB), satisfying artifact availability requirements, and adhering to strict ACM publication standards. This process ensures the research output is publicly usable, traceable, and robust.

A detailed guide modeling the rigorous multi-round review process for major academic conferences, such as IMC. It covers the unique two-deadline cycle, the distinction between 'One-Shot-Revision' (a bounded, actionable contract) and general revisions, and emphasizes key review criteria including ethical treatment, artifact availability, and vantage-point representativeness. Essential for authors submitting measurement-heavy research.

This resource guides authors on positioning their research for the International Conference on Automated Machine Learning (AutoML). It helps evaluate if a manuscript—especially those involving NAS, HPO, or meta-learning—is a suitable fit for the venue. The focus is on framing contributions that enhance the automated search process, robust methodologies, and system pipelines, rather than solely relying on final leaderboard scores.

This comprehensive guide outlines best practices for designing, evaluating, and reporting experimental results in speech processing research (ASR, TTS, Speaker Verification, etc.). It details required metrics (WER, MOS, EER), establishing robust baselines, conducting significance testing (bootstrap, CI), and ensuring comprehensive condition coverage (speakers, noise, languages) to enhance the scientific rigor of academic submissions.

This comprehensive guide details the end-to-end technical program committee (TPC) review process for major academic conferences like INTERSPEECH. It walks through every stage—from initial submission and area assignment to independent review, rebuttal, meta-review, and final decision. Users can learn how to decode reviewer feedback, understand the limitations of the rebuttal, and develop a strategic plan for future submissions and research refinement.

A comprehensive framework for strengthening International Relations (IR) manuscripts, particularly for top-tier journals. It guides researchers through rigorous design requirements, including causal identification in dyadic/network data, structured case selection and process tracing, experimental planning (surveys/conjoint), and formal-empirical linkages. The focus is on ruling out rival explanations and establishing robust empirical claims.