Skill UI

This guide assists researchers targeting top journals like China Rural Economy (CRE). It provides a structured self-check process for manuscripts, ensuring the topic strictly adheres to the "Three Rural Issues" scope, establishes deep theoretical grounding, and articulates clear, multi-faceted marginal contributions suitable for high-impact academic publication.

This guide deciphers the rigorous review process for the journal *Criminology*. It details the double-anonymized peer review, editorial screening, and expert criteria expected in interdisciplinary criminology research. Use it before submission to stress-test your manuscript against likely rejection grounds, ensuring your paper has a clear theoretical contribution, robust methodology, and proper handling of crime measurement.

This guide provides comprehensive standards for achieving auditability and transparency in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) research. It teaches researchers how to document non-shareable evidence, such as field interviews, log traces, and system deployments, by focusing on detailed analysis trails, decision logs, and rigorous process documentation, thus strengthening academic rigor.

A comprehensive guide for researchers to determine if their human-centered research belongs in CSCW. It provides a critical unit-of-analysis test (group, community, organization) and a routing decision process to ensure the paper's focus is on cooperative practice, not just individual interaction. Use this before drafting to optimize submission to the correct academic venue.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing research manuscripts for top-tier academic economics journals. It details the systematic process of responding to reviewer reports (R&R), covering structural requirements, appropriate tones (acceptance, partial acceptance, rejection), and specific methodological tips (e.g., addressing endogeneity, mechanism identification, and policy relevance in the context of Chinese economics).

A detailed model of the ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) research manuscript review process. This guide explains the double-blind, TPC-driven, and single-shot nature of the evaluation, emphasizing the critical balance between genuine novelty and measured Quality-of-Results (QoR). It outlines the high standards for evidence fairness, benchmark credibility, and ablation studies required for acceptance, differentiating DAC's approach from architecture and software venues.

This skill guides authors on submitting manuscripts to Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL). It evaluates whether quantitative research in geochemistry, geophysics, or planetary science presents a generalizable process or mechanism of broad scientific interest, adhering to Elsevier's rigorous house style and data policies. Use it as a fit/venue-selection tool for re-framing specialized regional studies into broadly relevant scientific mechanisms.

A detailed guide for modeling the complete academic peer-review lifecycle, specifically tailored to the ECCV conference structure. It covers the timeline from submission through rebuttal and AC discussion to final decision, detailing critical points such as co-author enforcement regimes, LLM policy adherence, panel reviewer composition, and strategic points influencing the final outcome. Essential for researchers targeting top-tier vision conferences.

This guide outlines the creation of a complete, verifiable research package for economic policy manuscripts. It ensures that all empirical, experimental, or simulation results are fully reproducible by providing raw data guides, cleaning scripts, analysis code, and a single 'master' script that runs end-to-end. This process is critical for academic acceptance, allowing reviewers and discussants to independently verify every figure, table, and key number reported in the paper.

A comprehensive guide detailing the multi-cycle, rolling model for EDBT research submissions. It covers the entire review pipeline, from initial program committee evaluation and author-feedback exchange, through the accept/revise/reject decision, and critically, the in-cycle revise-and-resubmit stage. The guide also contrasts EDBT's open-access, three-cycle cadence with other top-tier database conferences (e.g., SIGMOD, VLDB).

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting database systems papers to EDBT. It details the complexities of the multiple-cycle rolling publication model, covering everything from initial evidence lock and cycle selection to the five-step review arc (Submission, Author Feedback, Revision, etc.). Use this to backward-plan your research timeline and manage the entire academic publishing process.

This comprehensive workflow router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of preparing a manuscript for the European Economic Review (EER). It systematically diagnoses bottlenecks and maps the optimal sequence of specialized skills—from refining the general-interest topic, building causal identification, strengthening theory models, checking robustness, to mastering the writing style and managing the final submission package. It ensures the academic output meets the high standards of a top-tier economics journal.