Skill UI

A comprehensive collection of agent skills for rigorously auditing digital interfaces and user flows. It evaluates designs against 168 research-backed UX/UI principles, detects common design antipatterns, and provides specialized review for AI-powered interfaces, ensuring adherence to modern best practices.

This skill analyzes accumulated usage logs from a complex research harness (ARIS) to propose structural optimizations. It identifies areas for improvement in SKILL scripts, default parameters, workflow ordering, and reviewer prompts. It is designed to automate the meta-level engineering process, ensuring that system efficiency is continuously improved based on real-world usage data.

Generates structured peer-review quality critiques of academic papers, covering summaries, methodology scrutiny, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and recommendations across domains whenever a user requests reviews, analyses, or summaries of research publications.

A persistent, structured knowledge base designed to accumulate and connect all facets of research—including papers, ideas, experiments, and claims. Inspired by modern LLM patterns, it moves beyond simple literature reviews by building a dynamic, interconnected graph of knowledge. Use it to track how ideas evolve, how experiments validate claims, and how new papers build upon prior work, ensuring knowledge compounding across the entire research lifecycle.

This technique is designed for advanced academic research, enabling users to search for theses by running two parallel tracks: a Topic Track (focusing on discipline, methodology, and materials) and a People Track (focusing on university, advisor, degree type, and year). By switching between these two methodologies, users can cross-validate results and significantly improve the accuracy and completeness of their literature review.

A comprehensive mentor for graduate students and early-career researchers, guiding the entire research lifecycle. This skill covers formulating rigorous research questions, designing studies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods), conducting literature reviews, analyzing data, and writing publishable papers. It emphasizes methodological rigor, critical thinking, and ethical considerations.

An autonomous research agent that plans complex investigations using Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs). It executes sub-questions in parallel, performs gap analysis, and iteratively refines findings before synthesizing a comprehensive, structured report. Ideal for deep market analysis, academic literature reviews, or complex problem-solving requiring multiple data sources.

A systematic tool for scientific inquiry, guiding users through the entire research process. It helps formulate testable, mechanistic hypotheses from raw observations or preliminary data, following the established scientific method. The workflow includes comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, generating competing explanations, and designing experiments, all while mandating the creation of scientific schematics for visualization.

Create professional, data-driven infographics effortlessly. This skill uses advanced AI (Nano Banana Pro) integrated with web research to gather accurate statistics and facts. It supports various visualization types (e.g., timelines, comparisons, statistical charts) and includes a smart iterative review process, ensuring the output meets high quality standards for specific document types like marketing materials or business reports. No design expertise required.

An end-to-end toolkit designed for analyzing high-density Neuropixels electrophysiology recordings. It implements best practices using SpikeInterface, covering the entire workflow: data loading (SpikeGLX, NWB), preprocessing, motion/drift correction, advanced spike sorting (Kilosort4), quality metric computation, and unit curation (including AI-assisted review). Ideal for neuroscience research.

A systematic framework designed for conducting rigorous peer reviews of scientific manuscripts and grant proposals. It provides a structured, checklist-based evaluation covering methodology rigor, statistical validity, reporting compliance (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), and assesses all sections from abstract to results. Ideal for academic publishing, research quality assessment, and providing detailed, constructive feedback.

Utilize the ScholarEval framework for comprehensive and structured evaluation of academic works, including research papers, proposals, and literature reviews. Assess quality across critical dimensions like problem formulation, methodology rigor, data analysis, and scholarly writing. Provides both quantitative scoring and actionable feedback to enhance publication readiness.