Skill UI

This comprehensive workflow guides authors through the complex, multi-stage process of developing a purely theoretical contribution for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) submission. It acts as a router, directing the user to specific specialized skills at each point of the scholarly writing process, from topic selection to contribution framing and final polish. It emphasizes that the deliverable is pure theory, not empirical data.

This guide provides late-stage polishing for academic manuscripts, specifically targeting the Academy of Management Review (AMR) house style. It helps transform drafts that read like literature reviews or essays into tightly structured, argument-driven theoretical pieces. Key focus areas include establishing a clear theoretical puzzle in the introduction, maintaining continuous argumentative flow, ensuring precise definition of constructs, and articulating propositions without using hypothesis language. It is crucial for authors who need to refine their prose and structure before final subm...

A comprehensive strategy guide for mathematical authors to stress-test their proofs before submission. It outlines how expert academic referees rigorously review work, advising on strengthening weak steps, verifying external theorems, clarifying the core argument, and handling boundary cases to significantly improve the manuscript's rigor and chances of acceptance.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for authors submitting high-level academic manuscripts (e.g., AMS-LaTeX articles). It guides users through verifying technical formatting, mathematical rigor, reference consistency, and logistical requirements before final portal submission. It ensures the manuscript is ready for peer review, focusing on structure and format, not scientific merit.

A comprehensive guide to the rigorous standards for structuring pure mathematics manuscripts, specifically detailing the proper use of appendices and auxiliary material. It teaches authors how to distinguish between the essential core argument (which must remain in the main text) and supplementary technical results, long computations, or background lemmas (which belong in the appendix). This ensures the main text remains focused while maintaining academic rigor and verifiability for peer review.

This skill guides authors through evaluating the suitability of their clinical research manuscript for Annals of Internal Medicine. It provides deep insights into the journal's high standards, including specific methodological requirements (CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE, STARD, TRIPOD), required evidence synthesis depth, ideal scope (RCTs, systematic reviews, guidelines), and current house style guidelines necessary for successful submission.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (ARA&A). It details the journal's unique positioning as a high-impact, invited review venue, emphasizing that it publishes critical syntheses, not primary research. Use this tool to scope, frame, and check the evidence bar, house style, and submission requirements for authoritative, cross-disciplinary astronomical reviews.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics (AREES). It details the journal's strict requirements for authoritative syntheses, covering scope, conceptual structure, methodology, and house style. Use this tool when proposing or writing high-level review articles that define future research directions in Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.

This comprehensive guide helps authors evaluate the suitability of their manuscript for the Annual Review of Economics. It outlines the journal's specific high standards for scholarly synthesis, emphasizing that the content must provide a balanced, expert intellectual map of an entire subfield, rather than presenting new original empirical results. Use this skill to check fit, understand the invited submission process, and structure a comprehensive review for a broad, educated professional audience.

This guide helps authors determine if their work meets the high standard required by the Annual Review of Environment and Resources (AREAR). It focuses on synthesizing diverse environmental fields (climate, water, biodiversity, energy) into a field-defining, authoritative review, rather than presenting primary data or a simple literature summary. Use this when proposing or checking the scope for an invited, synthesizing review.

This skill guides authors on submitting authoritative, synthesized review articles to the Annual Review of Plant Biology. It clarifies the expectations for invited reviews, emphasizing balance, comprehensive synthesis, and forward-looking insights across plant molecular, cellular, and developmental biology. It is essential for authors proposing a review topic or refining their manuscript structure to meet high academic standards.

A comprehensive guide for authors facing a revise-and-resubmit (R&R) status in academic journals. It outlines the entire revision lifecycle, from building a structured response matrix and performing substantive re-analysis (re-coding, new experiments) to strategically drafting the point-by-point rebuttal letter. Focuses on maintaining academic rigor, reconciling conflicting reviews, and ensuring methodological consistency before final resubmission.