Skill UI

This specialized skill reviews user interface animations, motion patterns, and interactive code (CSS, Framer Motion, etc.) against a strict, high-craft standard. It evaluates not only functionality but also performance, accessibility, physical correctness, and adherence to motion design principles. Use it when reviewing diffs related to transitions, keyframes, or gestures to ensure the motion feels right, not just that it runs.

This skill runs a read-only audit to assess production deployment readiness. It reviews release artifacts, migration changes, configuration gaps, and potential risks (including rollback feasibility and launch blockers) before actual deployment or merging. It helps reduce coordination failures and ensures a safe release cycle.

This comprehensive tool performs an architectural audit of a codebase, mapping module dependencies, checking layering integrity, and flagging structural decay. Drawing on classic engineering principles (like Conway's Law and Testability Seams), it provides a deep assessment of the project's health and structure. Ideal for large-scale code reviews or onboarding new developers.

This skill provides comprehensive pull request (PR) code reviews that go beyond simple syntax checks. It aggressively surfaces deep-rooted decay risks, architectural design smells, and maintainability issues. Findings are reported using a structured Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy framework, drawing insights from classic engineering principles. Ideal for reviewing complex or crucial code modules.

This advanced skill performs code review by simulating the documented engineering philosophies of historical figures (e.g., Linus Torvalds, Steve Jobs, Ken Thompson). It moves beyond generic AI findings by grounding critiques in specific, citable principles—such as 'good taste' or 'customer experience.' Ideal for high-stakes PRs, architectural reviews, and ensuring deep, pre-submission code hardening.

A specialized presentation deck template adopting a cyberpunk, CRT terminal aesthetic. It is ideal for conducting deep technical reviews, such as benchmarking CLI agents, demonstrating code diffs, or presenting complex development tool analyses. Features a dark background, grid lines, command prompt indicators, and structured tagging for maximum professional impact.

A structured presentation deck designed for rigorous review of safety incidents, security risks, and policy compliance. It utilizes distinct visual cues, including hazard stripes, L1/L2/L3 severity tiers, and dedicated code blocks for policy review (e.g., YAML). Ideal for red team exercises, post-incident reviews, and high-stakes technical briefings.

A powerful tool for conversational time tracking. Users simply report time spent in plain language (e.g., "read papers 2h, gym 1h"), and the skill parses this into structured rows (Activity, Minutes, Date) within your Notion database. It ensures data integrity by flagging any uncertain details as 'To-confirm' rows and batch-asking questions, preventing data fabrication. Use it for logging daily activities or performing time reviews.

This tool reviews code changes (via diff) against accepted Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) to detect potential architectural drift, compliance violations, and adherence issues. It simulates a pre-merge check, ensuring that new code respects established architectural constraints and decisions made by the team. Ideal for CI/CD pipelines and mandatory code reviews.

Generates structured CodeTour `.tour` files in JSON format for detailed, step-by-step code walkthroughs. This tool is essential for onboarding new engineers, conducting architectural reviews, or documenting complex PR changes. It provides a guided narrative that directs users to specific files and line anchors, ensuring a structured and focused learning journey.

This comprehensive guide establishes foundational coding standards and best practices for enhancing code quality, readability, and maintainability across all projects. It covers naming conventions, immutability patterns, error handling, and core design principles like KISS, DRY, and YAGNI, applicable to TypeScript, JavaScript, and React development. Use it when starting a new module or performing code reviews.

Performs multi-baseline counterfactual cost analysis by comparing actual session spending against hypothetical costs generated by fixed, non-optimal models (e.g., always-haiku, always-sonnet). This tool quantifies the financial savings realized by the smart routing mechanism, answering the critical question: 'Is the routing earning its keep?' It is ideal for quarterly cost reviews, setting CI performance gates, and validating routing configurations.