Skill UI

This skill activates 'Steno Mode,' providing highly compressed, expert-level responses by eliminating filler words and superfluous tokens (up to 40% reduction). It maintains absolute technical precision, making it ideal for technical communications like code reviews, debugging Q&A, and architecture summaries. Users can select four defined levels (lite, brief, court, machine) to control the density, with exactness always taking top priority.

A comprehensive guide for authors navigating the submission process for Trends in Cognitive Sciences (TiCS). This resource details the journal's specific requirements for reviews, opinions, and conceptual frameworks, including its highly invited nature, required critical synthesis, and unique structural conventions (e.g., Box panels). Use this to assess the fit of your work before submission.

This guide provides a strategic framework for drafting author responses to challenging peer reviews in academic conferences. It teaches authors how to structure replies by addressing four key axes (Correctness, Novelty, Backing, Clarity), ensuring technical precision, maintaining anonymity, and framing commitments that survive the subsequent Area Chair (AC) discussion phase.

This guide provides comprehensive instructions for authors responding to peer reviews and engaging with a shepherd during major security symposium cycles (like USENIX Security). It details the technical mechanics of writing effective rebuttals, addressing compliance gaps (e.g., ethics/disclosure), and managing limited revisions during the post-acceptance shepherding phase.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors responding to major conference reviews (like IEEE VIS). It details the distinct strategies for both first-round rebuttals and mandatory second-round revisions (conditional accept). Learn how to structure summaries of changes, address technical critiques, maintain anonymity, and turn reviewer skepticism into acceptance.

This guide outlines the rigorous process for authors responding to a "revise" verdict at top-tier academic conferences. It teaches authors how to treat reviewer feedback as a formal contract, manage a tight revision timeline, structure necessary experiments, and write a highly traceable change document that explicitly addresses every required point.

Comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end academic submission workflow for the WACV conference. This specialized workflow accounts for the two-round submission model, including key branching points like Round 1 reviews, optional rebuttals, Revise-and-Resubmit stages, Round 2 revisions, and final camera-ready preparation, which single-deadline plans often miss.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR), a high-impact journal for authoritative, continuously updated review articles in relativity and gravitation. It covers the journal's unique 'living' model, required evidence standards, scope definition, house style, and the long-term commitment required to create a definitive, pedagogical survey article.

Provides a comprehensive, step-by-step workflow for conducting rigorous literature reviews across academic, biomedical, and technical domains. It guides users through defining research questions (PICO), developing systematic search protocols, evidence logging, source screening, structured data extraction, and synthesizing findings to build high-quality, reproducible review reports.

This skill provides a comprehensive, reproducible rubric for evaluating scholarly and scientific work. It covers nine critical dimensions—including problem statement, methodology, data evidence, analysis rigor, and citation quality—making it ideal for reviewing research papers, grant proposals, literature reviews, and academic theses. Use it to provide structured, actionable, and professional feedback to enhance scholarly output.

A comprehensive white-box security auditing workflow designed for proprietary source code. It integrates static analysis security testing (SAST) tools like Semgrep and CodeQL to detect common vulnerabilities (e.g., injection, IDOR, crypto misuse), followed by mandatory manual threat modeling and verification steps. Applicable for PR reviews and pre-deployment security checks.

This guide provides a systematic framework for authorized email security reviews. It covers advanced phishing analysis, including deep dives into email headers, assessing SPF/DKIM/DMARC compliance, identifying Business Email Compromise (BEC) patterns, and researching mailbox token abuse. It is essential for incident response, threat intelligence, and security architecture review.