Skill UI

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting academic papers, specifically tailored for the IEEE VIS conference cycle. It maps out all critical milestones, from initial area selection and abstract submission through to conditional acceptance revisions and final camera-ready preparation. Use this skill to responsibly plan for the annual cycle, manage reviewers' expectations, and mitigate common submission risks.

This comprehensive router guides authors through the entire lifecycle of a rigorous development economics manuscript targeted at The World Bank Economic Review (WBER). It outlines the ideal sequence of specialized skills—from initial topic selection and literature positioning to establishing credible causal identification, managing robustness checks, and preparing the final submission package and rebuttal letter, ensuring the paper meets WBER's demanding standards.

This skill models the entire peer-review pipeline for Web Conferences (WWW), detailing the stages from abstract submission to final notification. It guides authors and reviewers on the implications of track-scoped double-blind review, emphasizing criteria such as Web-centricity, evidence scale, and ethical considerations required for acceptance.

This skill establishes the root directory for a collaborative workshop, serving as a centralized project hub. It manages two distinct paths: using an existing local directory (Path A), or initializing a new private GitHub repository (Path B). It scaffolds the necessary structure—including `desks/`, `bench/`, and `CAIRN.md`—while strictly preserving existing work and preventing repository nesting. Ideal for standardizing project setup and maintaining collaboration standards.

This skill is a specialized guide used by authors to evaluate the fit and required rigor for submitting development economics manuscripts to the World Bank Economic Review (WBER). It assesses the manuscript's alignment with the journal's focus on policy-relevant empirical micro and macro research, covering methodological standards (RCTs, IV, DiD), required policy framing, and structural formatting.

This skill assesses whether a manuscript is suitable for World Development, a leading multidisciplinary development-studies journal. It guides authors on re-framing their work to focus on real-world development problems, policy relevance, and global issues (e.g., poverty, climate, governance). It clarifies the required balance between rigorous methodology and multidisciplinary, actionable insights for a broad academic readership.

This skill provides a comprehensive framework for targeting and revising academic manuscripts for the journal World Economic Studies. It analyzes the journal's scope, focusing on globalization, open strategy, international trade, and regional economics. It guides users on required advanced methodologies (e.g., GVC decomposition, panel data), structural mandates, and common submission pitfalls to ensure manuscripts meet high academic standards.

This skill provides comprehensive norms for executing and reporting robust, reproducible data analysis in comparative, cross-national, or formal-empirical studies. It guides authors on honestly reporting uncertainty, ensuring statistical robustness, performing rigorous cross-national inference, and integrating qualitative evidence through triangulation to meet the demanding standards of top academic journals.

This skill guides the creation of self-contained, highly accessible, and reproducible exhibits (tables, figures, maps) for World Politics manuscripts. It addresses strict length limits by differentiating between core arguments (in the article) and supplementary material (online appendix). It emphasizes visual communication excellence, moving beyond simple coefficient tables to forest plots and event studies to convey magnitude and uncertainty effectively.

This skill is essential for scholars working in Comparative Politics and International Relations. It guides the process of transforming single-case empirical findings into robust, portable theoretical arguments. By explicitly defining causal mechanisms, stating scope conditions, and identifying observable implications, the skill ensures the research contribution significantly advances theoretical debates across multiple cases or contexts.

This skill serves as a comprehensive guide for academic authors, helping them pressure-test if their research topic is appropriate for specialist journals in comparative politics and international relations (IR). It helps determine if a project is substantive, comparative (travels across cases/systems), theory-advancing, and falls within the journal's core scope, ensuring the work meets high academic standards.

This tool acts as the central orchestrator for academic manuscripts submitted to World Politics. It guides authors through the entire scholarly writing lifecycle, determining the correct article type (research vs. review), verifying the scope (must cross cases in comparative politics/IR), and routing the project to the appropriate specialized writing skills (e.g., theory building, data analysis, literature positioning). It ensures the work maintains a big, comparative, and international scope.