Skill UI

A comprehensive guide detailing the empirical writing style required for EMNLP submissions. It emphasizes scoping claims to specific datasets and languages, ensuring examples are load-bearing, structuring the argument phenomenon-first, and accurately calibrating hedging language based on evidence strength.

A comprehensive guide for revising academic papers submitted to FAccT (Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency). It instructs authors on how to frame socio-technical contributions to be legible to a mixed panel of computer scientists, lawyers, and social scientists. Focus areas include scoping claims to specific populations, explicitly arguing adverse impacts, and making interdisciplinary concepts native to the text.

This guide provides a comprehensive understanding of the Human Relations (HR) journal's two-gate review system. It details the editorial scoping screen, the double-anonymous developmental peer review, and how to accurately interpret various decision types (e.g., Major Revision vs. Reject). It is crucial for authors to calibrate expectations regarding theoretical contribution, process timelines, and strategic decisions about rerouting to sibling journals.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising academic papers, particularly in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs). It teaches how to adopt the measurement-forward, evidence-based register required by top-tier conferences like COLM. Focus areas include leading with findings, strictly scoping claims to tested models and versions, structuring content for tight page limits, and maintaining a measured, critical voice.

This guide helps researchers assess if a corporate finance question is suitable for the Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF). It provides a framework to determine if the topic fits the journal's empirical or theoretical remit (e.g., governance, M&A, financial structure) and advises on the optimal article format (full-length vs. shorter paper). It serves as a critical self-check against common academic rejection pitfalls.

This guide provides a rigorous framework for authors submitting to specialized environmental economics journals (like JEEM). It helps authors determine if their research core environmental or resource mechanisms, articulate clear welfare/policy stakes, and pass the field-specific scrutiny required to make a novel, high-impact contribution.

This tool guides researchers in scoping and rigorously testing a research topic for submission to top-tier finance journals, such as the Journal of Financial Economics (JFE). It helps users refine an economic question, establish a novel contribution, identify plausible causal links, and assess the paper's depth against high academic standards (e.g., Jensen or Fama-DFA prizes). It is crucial for transforming a general academic idea into a publishable, high-impact manuscript.

A comprehensive guide for academic researchers pitching topics to the Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO). This skill helps authors test whether their research contribution is genuinely rooted in institutional or organizational claims, rather than being a pure market outcome or a general micro-economics finding. It refines the focus, mechanism, and intended academic audience.

This guide helps academic researchers scope their research questions and determine the appropriate contribution type (empirical paper, meta-analysis, or systematic review) for top-tier general management journals. It teaches authors how to ensure their work has a broad, general-management theoretical contribution rather than being too niche, and how to strategically compare fit against competing academic journals.

A comprehensive guide for researchers deciding the optimal venue for systems projects, such as OSDI, SOSP, or NSDI. It provides structured tests (built-and-measured, operational experience) and scoping criteria to help authors determine if their work is a research contribution or a production-level lesson, ensuring projects are routed to the correct academic conference before significant time is spent writing.

This guide assists researchers in scoping their academic questions to ensure alignment with specialized journals like Research Policy. It provides detailed criteria for determining if a study focuses on the emergence, diffusion, or governance of innovation systems, rather than purely economic or strategy-focused outcomes. Use it to frame your work to speak directly to innovation scholars and policymakers.

This skill guides researchers through the rigorous process of refining a preliminary accounting idea into a sharp, contribution-driven research question suitable for top academic journals like Review of Accounting Studies (RAST). It helps users identify the core accounting construct, define the mechanism (friction/channel), and ensure the study's focus is on accounting theory, rather than merely using accounting data in a general finance context.