Skill UI

This guide provides rigorous standards for crafting academic literature reviews, particularly for specialized journals in economics. It instructs authors to move beyond simple citation listing and instead structure the review around identified research gaps. The required structure emphasizes a clear progression from 'Current Status' to 'Deficiencies' and finally to 'Novel Positioning,' ensuring the paper's marginal contribution is clearly derived from a knowledge gap.

A comprehensive guide detailing the methodology for packaging, documenting, and staging research artifacts (including code, datasets, knowledge graphs, and demo systems) for CIKM conference submission. It covers best practices for licensing, provenance tracking, versioning, and transitioning artifacts from anonymous review status to citable public releases, ensuring reproducibility and adoptability.

This guide provides an in-depth analysis of the CIKM peer review process, which operates under double-blind rules and integrates perspectives from three distinct fields: Information Retrieval, Data Mining, and Knowledge Management. It details how authors can optimize their submissions to satisfy diverse expert standards, how to interpret complex, multi-faceted review reports, and the critical dynamics that determine a paper's acceptance status.

This comprehensive guide provides expert protocols for writing the 'Related Work' section in Machine Learning papers. It teaches authors how to maintain 'versioned honesty' by meticulously triaging the literature into distinct lanes (e.g., method lineage, model artifacts, evaluation infrastructure). It covers advanced topics like managing concurrent work, citing arXiv status accurately, and avoiding self-citation violations, ensuring the paper is positioned rigorously within the rapidly evolving academic field.

A comprehensive pre-submission audit guide for authors submitting papers to EACL (Computational Linguistics). It covers critical areas such as adherence to format gates (8/4 content pages, required Limitations section), strict anonymity requirements, mandatory declarations (Responsible NLP, preprint status), and crucial advice regarding the single, non-fallback submission cycle. Use this before uploading to the ACL Rolling Review cycle.

This guide helps authors sharpen their intellectual contribution by meticulously positioning their game-theory manuscript against the existing canonical literature. It ensures the author clearly defines the 'delta'—the novel assumption, theorem, or result—relative to prior work, pre-empting common reviewer objections regarding novelty or special-case status. Essential for submissions to highly specialized journals.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous process of preparing a double-blind academic paper for its final, public, dual-published status across ACM and IEEE platforms. It systematically covers de-anonymization (restoring names, affiliations, and acknowledgments), ensuring all rebuttal promises are met within strict page limits, and managing complex metadata requirements (ORCID, CCS concepts, rights blocks). It serves as a final production checklist for authors.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing submissions for the INTERSPEECH conference. This audit checklist covers critical aspects including strict 4-page formatting compliance, maintaining double-anonymous status throughout the review period, meticulous metadata handling (CMT fields), and navigating the specific paper update windows and potential desk-reject triggers.

A comprehensive guide detailing the editorial pipeline for the Journal of Banking & Finance (JBF). It explains the initial desk screen, double-anonymized refereeing process, the role of submission fees, and how to interpret status updates in Editorial Manager. Essential for authors submitting finance and banking manuscripts.

This comprehensive guide outlines the entire peer-review pipeline for the Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics (JCAD&CG). It details every stage, from initial editor screening and double-blind expert review, through major/minor revisions, to final acceptance. It helps authors understand their current status, expected next steps, and how to manage the academic submission timeline effectively.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for meeting modern academic publishing standards, particularly those required by educational psychology journals. It outlines mandatory requirements for ensuring research reproducibility, including depositing data, materials, and analysis code in trusted repositories with persistent identifiers (DOIs), adhering to JARS reporting standards, and documenting preregistration status.

This guide provides authors with best practices for improving the reproducibility and verifiable availability of communication experiments for submission to JOC. It clarifies the journal's current status regarding artifact badges, offering actionable advice on openly sharing code, data, and simulation parameters to enhance credibility while maintaining academic rigor.