Skill UI

This guide provides detailed structural and stylistic rules for authors submitting multi-study manuscripts to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP). It focuses on adhering to strict word caps for the Introduction and Discussion sections using APA 7th format, ensuring the narrative remains focused, theory-driven, and highly concise. Ideal for polishing drafts and structuring complex research arguments.

This skill assesses whether a research question or study aligns with the scope of top-tier public economics journals, such as JPubE. It guides the user to evaluate the government's economic role, the welfare implications, and the international generalizability of the findings, providing a critical review pass before submission.

A comprehensive guide for assembling a fully transparent and reproducible research package required for academic submissions (e.g., JRU/Springer). It structures the necessary components—including full experimental instructions, source code (z-Tree/Qualtrics), estimation scripts, and de-identified data—to allow any external party to replicate the study's findings end-to-end. Focuses on both procedural reproducibility and structural econometrics re-runnability.

A comprehensive guide on crafting convincing spatial exhibits for top-tier economics journals, especially those focusing on urban economics. This skill helps structure the necessary maps, regression tables, and event-study plots required to visually demonstrate the identifying variation (e.g., treatment boundaries, discontinuities). It focuses on best practices—such as reporting spatial standard errors and making maps do econometric work—rather than running the analysis itself.

A rigorous pre-writing framework used by researchers to stress-test a study's significance against the high standards of top-tier medical journals (e.g., The Lancet). It assesses whether the work is clinically important, globally relevant, likely to change policy, and addresses health equity, preventing wasted research efforts on unsuitable manuscripts.

This comprehensive guide helps authors select and apply the appropriate EQUATOR reporting guideline (e.g., CONSORT for RCTs, PRISMA for systematic reviews) for various study designs. It mandates the inclusion of detailed, reconciled flow diagrams and fully mapped checklists, ensuring manuscripts meet the rigorous methodological standards of top-tier academic journals by preventing selective reporting and verifying data consistency across all sections.

A mandatory skill for original research articles, designed to create The Lancet's signature 'Research in context' panel. This panel forces authors to synthesize their findings within a systematic evidence base by detailing what was known previously (with documented search strategies), outlining the specific added value of the current study, and discussing the collective implications for clinical practice and public health policy.

Provides a comprehensive checklist for ensuring methodological rigor in clinical and observational studies. It covers mandatory prospective trial registration (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov), pre-specified protocols/SAP, and critical elements like randomization, blinding, and power calculation for RCTs. Essential for manuscript preparation and review.

This guide details best practices for generating self-contained, high-impact exhibits (tables and figures) for academic journals, particularly those with strict page limits like Management Science. It instructs users on structuring both theoretical proofs (analytical lane) and empirical results (e.g., regression coefficients, event-study plots) to ensure the findings are immediately readable and persuasive, even without reading the main text.

A comprehensive guide for researchers targeting Molecular Ecology. It outlines the journal's scope, emphasizing that molecular methods must serve a clear ecological or evolutionary question, rather than being an end in themselves. It details required analyses (e.g., population genomics, phylogeography, eDNA), methodological rigor, and specific submission guidelines, ensuring the study's biological interpretation is strong and hypothesis-driven.

This guide helps authors transform complex academic empirical findings into robust, actionable policy implications. It teaches how to structure recommendations across distinct time horizons (short, medium, and long) and institutional levels (micro, meso, and macro). The core principle is ensuring every suggested policy point is directly tied to the study's evidence, targets a specific government department, and aligns with national strategic goals, elevating the paper's impact.

This guide assists researchers in determining whether a manuscript's topic, methodology, and theoretical contribution are appropriate for a specific theory-building management journal. It provides detailed criteria for evaluating conceptual relationships, suitable methods (SEM, experiment, case study), and appropriate re-routing suggestions for papers that are misaligned with the target journal's scope (e.g., pure math models, macro policy evaluation).