Skill UI

This skill guides authors on how to position interdisciplinary manuscripts for journals covering global environmental change (GEC). It emphasizes connecting multiple knowledge domains (e.g., biophysical science, governance, social science) and reframing the research gap as a conceptual contribution, rather than merely pointing out an absence of study. Essential for drafting strong introductions and satisfying reviewer requirements for disciplinary breadth.

This guide helps researchers translate academic findings into rigorous, evidence-grounded implications for policy, governance, and practice concerning global environmental change. It stresses that implications must be specific (naming actors and levers), honest about scope and uncertainty, and directly traceable to the study's results, avoiding generic overstatements.

This guide determines if a scholarly manuscript aligns with the scope of *History and Theory*, a leading venue for the philosophy of history and historical theory. It emphasizes that accepted submissions must contain an original theoretical or methodological argument, rather than merely being an empirical case study. Use this resource to frame, re-check, or select the appropriate academic venue for your advanced research.

This comprehensive guide outlines the process for packaging artifacts from Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) research. Recognizing that HRI artifacts are complex, involving human subjects, robot behaviors, and extensive study materials, this skill provides guidelines for honest, ethical, and reproducible dissemination. It covers structuring de-identified data, analysis code, and behavioral specifications while adhering to participant consent and academic archiving standards.

This guide details the necessary steps for achieving and reporting reproducibility in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) studies. Since HRI involves unique elements like human participants and physical environments, reproducibility focuses on making the study protocol, robot behavior specifications, analysis code, and de-identified data transparent. Learn how to properly assemble a comprehensive replication package and ethically disclose limitations to enhance academic credibility in top-tier HRI publications.

This skill guides authors to evaluate if their mechanistic immunology study meets the high standards of the journal Immunity. It serves as a comprehensive pre-submission checklist, detailing required evidence (in vivo validation, single-cell genomics, multi-omic data), necessary mechanistic depth, structural requirements, and strict submission guidelines to ensure the core advance is the immune mechanism.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors determining the fit of their empirical software engineering (SE) manuscript for the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). It helps authors rigorously check the study design, evidence bar, proper framing, and necessary re-framing required to transform a journal or arXiv-style paper into a high-quality conference submission suitable for ESEM reviewers. It focuses on measurement validity, experimental rigor, and evidence synthesis.

Provides an in-depth strategic guide to the academic conference submission pipeline, using ISCA as a detailed case study. It meticulously details the two-round review structure, the critical rebuttal/revision window, and offers actionable strategies for authors to navigate reviewer feedback, committee deliberations, and the final decision-making process in top-tier architecture venues.

This guide ensures that the chosen research methodology genres (e.g., behavioral empirical, analytical modeling, design science) are correctly aligned with the core research claim or phenomenon. It helps researchers identify the necessary design rigor, appropriate identification strategies (like DiD or IV), and the level of analysis required to ensure the study can genuinely support its contribution in the IS domain.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for writing and submitting manuscripts to the Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR). It guides authors through the entire writing lifecycle, emphasizing the critical 'reframing test' to ensure the work addresses issues of broad, fundamental interest to the study of religion, rather than remaining confined to a narrow subfield. It provides a structured path from initial idea generation to final submission and revision.

A comprehensive methodological guide detailing how to design rigorous, publishable empirical or analytical studies for top-tier accounting and economics journals (like JAE). It focuses heavily on achieving causal identification by mastering techniques such as Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Instrumental Variables (IV), Regression Discontinuity (RDD), and event studies, ensuring the study design credibly supports the economic prediction.

This guide outlines the rigorous standards for preparing empirical tables and figures for top-tier academic journals, such as the Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE). It covers the entire research workflow, including variable definition, sample construction, descriptive statistics, correlation matrices, advanced regressions, and event studies. The goal is to ensure all exhibits are self-contained, reproducible, and meet strict academic reviewer expectations.